Women Offender Programs and Issues

Women Offender Statistical Overview 2007

Introduction

The majority of the tables in this document focus on the regional institutions (Nova Institution for Women, Joliette, Grand Valley for Women, Okimaw Ohci Healing Lodge, Edmonton Institution for Women and Fraser Valley Institution.  However, where appropriate, data is also included from Isabel McNeil (Ontario) and Regional Psychiatric Centre (Prairies).

Here are a few key points of interest in the following report:
 Notes:

  • The last inmate left Prison for Women in May 2000;
  • Nova Institution for Women opened in 1995 and the Secure Unit opened in January 2003;
  • Joliette Institution opened in 1997 and the Secure Unit opened in May 2003;
  • Grand Valley Institution for Women opened in 1997 and the Secure Unit opened in October 2004;
  • Okimaw Ohci Healing Lodge opened in 1995.
  • Edmonton Institution for Women opened in 1995 and the Secure Unit opened in March 2003.
  • Fraser Valley Institution opened in 2004 and the Secure Unit opened in March 2006
  • There has been an increase of 21% in the federal women offender population since March 31, 2003; An increase of 34% for women incarcerated and an increase of 12% for women who are presently in the Community.
  • The Prairie Region has the highest proportion of incarcerated women offenders.  This has been consistent since March 1999.  As of March 31, 2007 the Prairie Region accounts for 32% of the total incarcerated women offender population;
  • On April 8, 2007 the majority of the women offender incarcerated population were classified at a medium-security level (195 (41%)) followed by minimum security;
  • On March 31, 2007 there were 320 women incarcerated for a violent offence, accounting for 67%;
  • Incarcerated Aboriginal women offender (104) account for 23% of the total incarcerated federal women offender population (460).  Aboriginal peoples account for 3.3% of the total Canadian population;

LEGEND

CRS
Corporate Reporting System
EIFW
Edmonton Institution for Women
GVI
Grand Valley Institution for Women
IMH
Isabel McNeil House
Joliette
Joliette Institution
Nova
Nova Institution for Women
OMS
Offender Management System
OOHL
Okimaw Ochi Healing Lodge
RPC Prairies
Regional Psychiatric Centre Prairies
WOC
Warrant of Committal

Definitions

The statistics in this document are presented in two different formats: 1) at a point in time, and 2) over a period of time.

  1. at a point in time
    This measure is designed to illustrate a situation on a specific date.  Each Sunday, CSC takes a "snapshot" of the data in OMS relating to the offenders in each institution across the country.  This information is then stored separately from OMS and labeled as having been extracted from OMS on that Sunday's date.  These "snapshots" can then be used to compare one institution or region to another at the same point in time.  By comparing "snapshots", one point in time can be compared to other points in time on an institutional, regional or national level.  These types of figures are dynamic in that the numbers will change with each new "snapshot".  Incarcerated and community populations are often presented this way.

  2. over a period of time
    This measure is designed to illustrate an accumulation between two dates.  When the OMS data from each institution (as well as the archives) is amalgamated it is possible to use these types of measures to make comparisons and identify trends between one institution or region and another.  By adjusting the date parameters, it is possible to use these measures to compare an institutional, a regional, or the national view from one time period to another.  These types of figures are generally static in that they rarely change from one "snapshot" amalgamation to the next.  Offender admissions and releases are regularly presented this way.

Other:

Most of the tables provide information on the total population and then a more specific breakdown of the Aboriginal vs Non-Aboriginal populations.

Generally, the numbers and percentages of the specific Aboriginal/Non-Aboriginal tables add up to the total provided for the total population.

 



Distribution of the Total Federal Women Offender Population Incarcerated and in the Community - 2002-2007

Fiscal Year Incarcerated % Community % Total
2002-2003 356 44% 460 56% 816
2003-2004 379 47% 433 53% 812
2004-2005 368 44% 465 56% 833
2005-2006 408 45% 500 55% 908
2006-2007 476 48% 513 52% 989

Source: OMS, as of year end snapshot.

  • There has been an increase in the federal women offender population (21%) since March 31, 2003; however, the proportion of federal women offenders in the community is consistently higher than the proportion of the incarcerated women offender population.

Aboriginal

Fiscal Year Incarcerated % Community % Total
2002-2003 104 59% 72 41% 176
2003-2004 108 60% 71 40% 179
2004-2005 100 52% 91 48% 191
2005-2006 128 56% 100 44% 228
2006-2007 148 59% 103 41% 251

Source: OMS, as of year end snapshot.

Non-Aboriginal

Fiscal Year Incarcerated % Community % Total
2002-2003 252 39% 388 61% 640
2003-2004 271 43% 362 57% 633
2004-2005 268 42% 374 58% 642
2005-2006 280 41% 400 59% 680
2006-2007 328 44% 410 56% 738

Source: OMS, as of year end snapshot.

Incarcerated population: federal offenders housed in a penitentiary or a provincial prison with an incarcerated status and federal offenders on Temporary Absences

Community population: federal offenders on Day Parole with daily return, federal offenders in temporary detention, federal offenders on Day Parole, Full Parole, Statutory Release, and federal offenders that have been deported

Distribution of the Federal Women Offender Population - Incarcerated and in The Community, 2002-2007, by Region

Fiscal Year Status Atlantic Québec Ontario Prairies Pacific Total
2002-2003 Incarcerated 49 64% 71 46% 81 32% 121 50% 34 40% 356 44%
Community 27 36% 85 54% 175 68% 123 50% 50 60% 460 56%
2003-2004 Incarcerated 60 72% 76 49% 88 34% 116 53% 39 42% 379 47%
Community 23 28% 78 51% 174 66% 104 47% 54 58% 433 53%
2004-2005 Incarcerated 34 46% 73 46% 100 38% 114 49% 47 45% 368 44%
Community 40 54% 87 54% 161 62% 119 51% 58 55% 465 56%
2005-2006 Incarcerated 47 50% 76 48% 101 36% 137 53% 47 40% 408 45%
Community 47 50% 82 52% 179 64% 121 47% 71 60% 500 55%
2006-2007 Incarcerated 65 57% 72 44% 125 42% 154 53% 60 48% 476 48%
Community 50 43% 92 56% 170 58% 136 47% 65 52% 513 52%

Source: OMS, as of year end snapshot.

  • At year end 2006-2007 the Atlantic and the Prairie region are the only regions to have more women incarcerated than in the community.

Aboriginal - Incarcerated and in the Community

Fiscal Year Status Atlantic Québec Ontario Prairies Pacific Total
2002-2003 Incarcerated 5 71% 6 100% 13 57% 67 55% 13 68% 104 59%
Community 2 29% 0 0% 10 43% 54 45% 6 32% 72 41%
2003-2004 Incarcerated 6 86% 5 71% 11 52% 66 58% 20 67% 108 60%
Community 1 14% 2 29% 10 48% 48 42% 10 33% 71 40%
2004-2005 Incarcerated 3 38% 3 60% 11 52% 69 55% 14 45% 100 52%
Community 5 63% 2 40% 10 48% 57 45% 17 55% 91 48%
2005-2006 Incarcerated 9 53% 3 50% 12 57% 85 56% 19 58% 128 56%
Community 8 47% 3 50% 9 43% 66 44% 14 42% 100 44%
2006-2007 Incarcerated 7 47% 6 86% 24 67% 93 58% 18 56% 148 59%
Community 8 53% 1 14% 12 33% 68 42% 14 44% 103 41%

Source: OMS, as of year end snapshot.

  • Aboriginal women tended to be incarcerated rather than on conditional release.  In the region of Quebec, for example, the numbers are very small and therefore the percentage is not very representative.

Non-Aboriginal - Incarcerated and in the Community

Fiscal Year Status Atlantic Quebec Ontario Prairies Pacific Total
2002-2003 Incarcerated 44 64% 65 43% 68 29% 54 44% 21 32% 252 39%
Community 25 36% 85 57% 165 71% 69 56% 44 68% 388 61%
2003-2004 Incarcerated 54 71% 71 49% 77 32% 50 47% 19 30% 271 43%
Community 22 29% 74 51% 163 68% 56 53% 44 70% 359 57%
2004-2005 Incarcerated 31 47% 70 45% 89 37% 45 42% 33 45% 268 42%
Community 35 53% 85 55% 151 63% 62 58% 41 55% 374 58%
2005-2006 Incarcerated 38 49% 73 48% 89 34% 52 49% 28 33% 280 41%
Community 39 51% 79 52% 170 66% 55 51% 57 67% 400 59%
2006-2007 Incarcerated 58 58% 66 42% 101 39% 61 47% 42 45% 328 44%
Community 42 42% 91 58% 158 61% 68 53% 51 55% 410 56%

Source: OMS, as of year end snapshot.

Distribution of the Incarcerated Federal Women Offender Population - 2002-2006, by Region

Date Atlantic Québec Ontario Prairies Pacific Total
March 31, 2003 49 14% 71 20% 81 23% 121 34% 34 10% 356
Sept. 30, 2003 40 11% 75 20% 97 26% 117 31% 46 12% 375
March 31, 2004 60 16% 76 20% 88 23% 116 31% 39 10% 379
Sept. 30, 2004 44 12% 74 20% 92 24% 121 32% 46 12% 377
March 31, 2005 34 9% 73 20% 100 27% 114 31% 47 13% 368
Sept. 30, 2005 57 14% 68 17% 96 24% 133 33% 45 11% 399
March 31, 2006 47 12% 76 19% 101 25% 137 34% 47 12% 408
Sept. 30, 2006 57 13% 71 16% 113 25% 156 35% 55 12% 452
March 31, 2007 65 14% 72 15% 125 26% 154 32% 60 13% 476

Source: CRS, as of dates listed above.

  • The total number of incarcerated federal women has increased (34%) since September 30, 2003;
  • The Prairie Region has the highest proportion of incarcerated women offenders. This has been consistent since March 1999. As of March 31, 2007 the Prairie Region accounts for 32% of the total incarcerated women offender population;
  • The Ontario and the Prairie Regions have consistently larger proportions of women compared to other regions, however the Atlantic and Pacific populations have been increasing since 2003.

Incarcerated population: federal offenders housed in a penitentiary or a provincial prison with an incarcerated status and federal offenders on Temporary Absences

Community population: federal offenders on Day Parole with daily return, federal offenders in temporary detention, federal offenders on Day Parole, Full Parole, Statutory Release, and federal offenders that have been deported.

Distribution of the Incarcerated Federal Aboriginal Women Offender Population

Date Atlantic Québec Ontario Prairies Pacific Total
March 31, 2003 5 5% 6 6% 13 13% 67 64% 13 13% 104
Sept. 30, 2003 4 4% 5 5% 17 16% 62 60% 16 15% 104
March 31, 2004 6 6% 5 5% 11 10% 66 61% 20 19% 108
Sept. 30, 2004 6 6% 3 3% 10 9% 71 66% 17 16% 107
March 31, 2005 4 4% 4 4% 11 11% 67 67% 14 14% 100
Sept. 30, 2005 7 6% 3 2% 10 8% 88 71% 16 13% 124
March 31, 2006 9 7% 3 2% 12 9% 85 66% 19 15% 128
Sept. 30, 2006 8 5% 4 3% 15 10% 103 68% 22 14% 152
March 31, 2007 7 5% 6 4% 24 16% 93 63% 18 12% 148

Source: CRS, as of dates listed above.

  • Since 2003, the actual number of Aboriginal women has increased 42%.

Distribution of the Incarcerated Federal Non-Aboriginal Women Offender Population

Date Atlantic Québec Ontario Prairies Pacific Total
March 31, 2003 44 17% 65 26% 68 27% 54 21% 21 8% 252
Sept. 30, 2003 36 13% 70 26% 80 30% 55 20% 30 11% 271
March 31, 2004 54 20% 71 26% 77 28% 50 18% 19 7% 271
Sept. 30, 2004 38 14% 71 26% 82 30% 50 19% 29 11% 270
March 31, 2005 30 11% 69 26% 89 33% 47 18% 33 12% 268
Sept. 30, 2005 50 18% 65 24% 86 31% 45 16% 29 11% 275
March 31, 2006 38 14% 73 26% 89 32% 52 19% 28 10% 280
Sept. 30, 2006 49 16% 67 22% 98 33% 53 18% 33 11% 300
March 31, 2007 58 18% 66 20% 101 31% 61 19% 42 13% 328

Source: CRS, as of dates listed above.

Incarcerated population: federal offenders housed in a penitentiary or a provincial prison with an incarcerated status and federal offenders on Temporary Absences

Community population: federal offenders on Day Parole with daily return, federal offenders in temporary detention, federal offenders on Day Parole, Full Parole, Statutory Release, and federal offenders that have been deported.

Distribution of the Incarcerated Federal Women Offender Population by Ethnic Origin

Race
Profile
March 31, 2003 March 31, 2004 March 31, 2005 March 31, 2006 March 31, 2007
Women % Women % Women % Women % Women %
Aboriginal 104 29% 108 28% 100 27% 128 31% 148 31%
Asiatic 9 3% 13 3% 9 2% 11 3% 9 2%
Black 26 7% 24 6% 29 8% 22 5% 31 7%
Caucasian 207 58% 219 58% 214 58% 232 57% 259 54%
Other 10 3% 15 4% 16 4% 15 4% 29 6%
Total 356 100% 379 100% 368 100% 408 100% 476 100%

Source: OMS, as of year end snapshot.

  • As of March 31, 2007, 54% of the incarcerated women offender population was Caucasian;
  • Other includes:  Not specified, unknown, blank.

Incarcerated Women Offenders - Security Classification Profile Federal Institutions

Institution Maximum % Medium % Minimum % At
Intake
% Total
Nova 9 14% 24 37% 22 34% 10 15% 65
Joliette 10 14% 40 56% 20 28% 2 3% 72
GVI 9 7% 31 26% 63 52% 18 15% 121
IMH   0%   0% 4 100%   0% 4
OOHL   0% 13 54% 9 38% 2 8% 24
RPC Prairies 3 33% 5 56%   0% 1 11% 9
EIFW 17 14% 49 41% 25 21% 28 24% 119
FVI 2 3% 32 54% 18 31% 7 12% 59
Other   0% 1 33% 1 33% 1 33% 3
Grand Total 50 11% 195 41% 162 34% 69 14% 476

Source: OMS, Snapshot as of April 08, 2007

  • On April 8, 2007 the majority of the woman offender population were classified at a medium-security level (195) followed by minimum security (162);
  • 11% (50) women were classified as maximum-security;
  • Nova Secure Unit opened in January 2003;
  • Joliette Institution Secure Unit Opened in June 2003.
  • Grand Valley Institution for Women Secure unit opened in October 2004;
  • Edmonton Institution for Women Secure Unit opened in March 2003;
  • Fraser Valley Institution Secure Unit opened in March 2006.
  • Okimaw Ohci Healing Lodge has no maximum security capacity.

Incarcerated Aboriginal - Security Classification Profile Federal Institutions

Institution Maximum % Medium % Minimum % At
Intake
% Total
Nova 2 29% 2 29% 2 29% 1 14% 7
Joliette   0% 6 100% 0 0%   0% 6
GVI 3 13% 11 46% 7 29% 3 13% 24
IMH                  
OOHL   0% 12 60% 6 30% 2 10% 20
RPC Prairies 2 40% 3 60%   0%     5
EIFW 14 21% 31 46% 10 15% 12 18% 67
FVI 1 6% 13 72% 4 22%     18
Other   0% 1 100%   0%     1
Grand Total 22 15% 79 53% 29 20% 18 12% 148

Source: OMS, Snapshot as of April 8, 2007

Incarcerated Non-Aboriginal - Security Classification Profile Federal Institutions

Institutions Maximum % Medium % Minimum % At
Intake
% Total
Nova 7 12% 22 38% 20 34% 9 16% 58
Joliette 10 15% 34 52% 20 30% 2 3% 66
GVI 6 6% 20 21% 56 58% 15 15% 97
IMH         4 100%     4
OOHL 0 0% 1 25% 3 75% 0 0% 4
RPC Prairies 1 25% 2 50% 0 0% 1 25% 4
EIFW 3 6% 18 35% 15 29% 16 31% 52
FVI 1 2% 19 46% 14 34% 7 17% 41
Other 0 0% 0 0% 1 50% 1 50% 2
Grand Total 28 9% 116 35% 133 41% 51 16% 328

Source: OMS, Snapshot as of April 8, 2007

Offence Profile - Incarcerated Women Offenders - By Region

Region One day
snapshot
First
Degree
Murder
Second
Degree
Murder
Sched. I Sched. II Non
Sched.
Total
Atlantic 2002-2003 1 9 26 4 9 49
2003-2004   9 29 7 15 60
2004-2005   6 16 1 11 34
2005-2006   5 27 1 14 47
2006-2007 1 4 35 9 16 65
Quebec 2002-2003 7 7 36 13 8 71
2003-2004 9 8 41 13 5 76
2004-2005 10 7 39 12 8 76
2005-2006 10 8 34 13 11 76
2006-2007 10 8 39 12 3 72
Ontario 2002-2003 3 12 32 24 10 81
2003-2004 3 11 41 25 8 88
2004-2005 3 12 43 34 8 100
2005-2006 4 15 44 27 11 101
2006-2007 6 20 52 33 14 125
Prairies 2002-2003 4 11 72 22 12 121
2003-2004 3 12 75 14 12 116
2004-2005 5 11 63 19 14 112
2005-2006 5 11 68 36 17 137
2006-2007 5 10 88 34 17 154
Pacific 2002-2003 1 10 19   4 34
2003-2004 1 10 22 2 4 39
2004-2005 1 10 23 7 5 46
2005-2006 1 11 27 4 4 47
2006-2007 1 11 30 6 12 60
Total 2002-2003 16 49 185 63 43 356
2003-2004 16 50 208 61 44 379
2004-2005 19 46 184 73 46 368
2005-2006 20 50 200 81 57 408
2006-2007 23 53 244 94 62 476

Source: CRS, April 2007

  • On March 31, 2007, 320 women (67%) of the incarcerated federal women offender population serving time for a violent crime;

Violent offences include first degree murder, second degree murder and offences listed under Schedule 1.

Offence Profile - Incarcerated Aboriginal - By Region

Region Year end
snapshot
First
Degree
Murder
Second
Degree
Murder
Sched. I Sched. II Non
Sched.
Total
Atlantic 2002-2003   1 3   1 5
2003-2004   2 1   3 6
2004-2005   1 3     4
2005-2006     8   1 9
2006-2007     6 1   7
Quebec 2002-2003   1 4 1   6
2003-2004     5     5
2004-2005   1 2   1 4
2005-2006     3     3
2006-2007 1 1 4     6
Ontario 2002-2003   2 9   2 13
2003-2004   3 6 2   11
2004-2005   2 8 1   11
2005-2006   3 8   1 12
2006-2007   6 14 2 2 24
Prairies 2002-2003 1 5 50 8 3 67
2003-2004 1 6 52 5 2 66
2004-2005 2 4 48 9 4 67
2005-2006 2 7 56 15 5 85
2006-2007 2 7 64 14 6 93
Pacific 2002-2003   3 9   1 13
2003-2004   3 15 1 1 20
2004-2005   4 9   1 14
2005-2006   5 13 1   19
2006-2007   2 12 1 3 18
Total 2002-2003 1 12 75 9 7 104
2003-2004 1 14 79 8 6 108
2004-2005 2 12 70 10 6 100
2005-2006 2 15 88 16 7 128
2006-2007 3 16 100 18 11 148

Source: CRS, April 2007

  • On March 31, 2007, 119 women (80%) of the incarcerated federal Aboriginal women offender population serving time for a violent crime;

Offence Profile - Non-Aboriginal - By Region

Region Year end
snapshot
First
Degree
Murder
Second
Degree
Murder
Sched. I Sched. II Non
Sched.
Total
Atlantic 2002-2003 1 8 23 4 8 44
2003-2004   7 28 7 12 54
2004-2005   5 13 1 11 30
2005-2006   5 19 1 13 38
2006-2007 1 4 29 8 16 58
Quebec 2002-2003 7 6 32 12 8 65
2003-2004 9 8 36 13 5 71
2004-2005 10 6 37 12 7 72
2005-2006 10 8 31 13 11 73
2006-2007 9 7 35 12 3 66
Ontario 2002-2003 3 10 23 24 8 68
2003-2004 3 8 35 23 8 77
2004-2005 3 10 35 33 8 89
2005-2006 4 12 36 27 10 89
2006-2007 6 14 38 31 12 101
Prairies 2002-2003 3 6 22 14 9 54
2003-2004 2 6 23 9 10 50
2004-2005 3 7 15 10 10 45
2005-2006 3 4 12 21 12 52
2006-2007 3 3 24 20 11 61
Pacific 2002-2003 1 7 10   3 21
2003-2004 1 7 7 1 3 19
2004-2005 1 6 14 7 4 32
2005-2006 1 6 14 3 4 28
2006-2007 1 9 18 5 9 42
Total 2002-2003 15 37 110 54 36 252
2003-2004 15 36 129 53 38 271
2004-2005 17 34 114 63 40 268
2005-2006 18 35 112 65 50 280
2006-2007 20 37 144 76 51 328

Source: CRS, April 2007

Admissions to the Regional Facilities Warrant of Committal per fiscal year

Regional
Facilities
Warrant of
Committal
2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007
Nova WOC 16 23 12 34 25
Repeat WOC 5 7 3 7 16
Joliette WOC 24 30 31 34 35
Repeat WOC 4 6 6 5 1
GVI
(I. McNeill
incl.)
WOC 64 64 70 66 80
Repeat WOC 7 10 4 6 13
OOHL WOC       2 4
Repeat WOC         2
EIFW WOC 45 63 76 77 98
Repeat WOC 8 7 5 14 7
FVI WOC     21 18 26
Repeat WOC     2 3 3
TOTAL WOC 149 180 210 231 268
Repeat WOC 24 30 20 35 42

Source: OMS, as of April 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007

  • The number of Initial warrant of committal admissions increased 80% since 2002-2003;
  • The number of Repeat warrant of committal admissions has increased of 75% since fiscal year 2002-2003;

Initial Warrant of Committal means that the offender has been admitted for the first time to federal jurisdiction. Repeat Warrant of Committal means that the offender has been admitted for the second time or more to federal jurisdiction.

Data included in the table consists of admissions into federal jurisdiction either as an initial warrant of committal (WOC) or a repeat warrant of committal (Repeat WOC).

Admissions to the Regional Facilities Warrant of Committal per fiscal year Aboriginal

Regional
Facilities
Warrant of
Committal
2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007
Nova WOC 1 6 1 6 3
Repeat WOC     1    
Joliette WOC 1 1 1 1 3
Repeat WOC 0 0 0 0 0
GVI 
 
(I. McNeill
incl.)
WOC 9 2 6 3 11
Repeat WOC 1 1 1 3 4
OOHL WOC       1 1
Repeat WOC         1
EIFW WOC 19 30 46 39 51
Repeat WOC 5 5 3 9 5
FVI WOC     5 8 6
Repeat WOC     1   2
TOTAL WOC 30 39 59 58 75
Repeat WOC 6 6 6 12 12

Source: OMS, as of April 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007

Admissions to the Regional Facilities Warrant of Committal per fiscal year Non-Aboriginal

Regional
Facilities
Warrant of
Committal
2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007
Nova WOC 15 17 11 28 22
Repeat WOC 5 7 2 7 16
Joliette WOC 23 29 30 33 32
Repeat WOC 4 6 6 5 1
GVI
(I. McNeill
incl.)
WOC 55 62 64 63 69
Repeat WOC 6 9 3 3 9
OOHL WOC 0 0 0 1 3
Repeat WOC 0 0 0 0 1
EIFW WOC 26 33 30 38 47
Repeat WOC 3 2 2 5 2
FVI WOC 0 0 16 10 20
Repeat WOC 0 0 1 3 1
TOTAL WOC 119 141 151 173 193
Repeat WOC 18 24 14 23 30

Source: OMS, as of April 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007

Data included in the table consists of admissions into federal jurisdiction either as an initial warrant of committal (WOC) or a repeat warrant of committal (Repeat WOC).

Offence Profile - All Admission Types by Institution

Institution Fiscal Year First
Degree
Murder
Second
Degree
Murder
Sched. I Sched. II Non
Sched.
Total
Nova 2002-2003   1 23 6 10 40
2003-2004   1 21 11 19 52
2004-2005   1 15 2 12 30
2005-2006   2 31 6 23 62
2006-2007 1   33 10 28 72
Joliette 2002-2003   1 17 19 9 46
2003-2004   1 24 17 6 48
2004-2005 2   27 20 13 62
2005-2006 1 3 27 21 17 69
2006-2007   3 30 17 8 58
GVI
(I. McNeill
incl.)
2002-2003     38 55 9 102
2003-2004     36 43 17 96
2004-2005   1 37 53 24 115
2005-2006 1 3 38 46 24 112
2006-2007 3 6 39 47 23 118
OOHL 2002-2003     7     7
2003-2004     4 1 1 6
2004-2005     2 1 3 6
2005-2006     10 2 2 14
2006-2007     11 6 3 20
RPC 2002-2003     1     1
2003-2004     1     1
2004-2005         1 1
2005-2006         1 1
2006-2007            
EIFW 2002-2003     41 40 14 95
2003-2004   3 64 38 25 130
2004-2005 2   78 40 19 139
2005-2006   3 62 51 25 141
2006-2007   2 77 52 18 149
FVI 2002-2003            
2003-2004     1     1
2004-2005     20 7 6 33
2005-2006   3 18 4 8 33
2006-2007   2 25 7 10 44
Total 2002-2003 0 2 127 120 42 291
2003-2004 0 5 151 110 68 334
2004-2005 4 2 179 123 78 386
2005-2006 2 14 186 130 100 432
2006-2007 4 13 215 139 90 461

Source: OMS, as of April 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007

  • Of the 291 admissions during the 2002/2003 fiscal year, 129 were for a violent offence (1st degree murder, 2nd degree murder and Schedule 1), accounting for 44% of all admissions.
  • Of the 461 admissions during the 2006/2007 fiscal year, 232 were for a violent offence, accounting for 50% of all admissions, and increase of 3% from fiscal year 2005-2006.

Offence Profile - All Admission Types - Aboriginal

Institution Fiscal Year First
Degree
Murder
Second
Degree
Murder
Sched. I Sched. II Non
Sched.
Total
Nova 2002-2003   1 2     3
2003-2004   1 3   4 8
2004-2005     1   2 3
2005-2006     7   3 10
2006-2007     3 1 1 5
Joliette 2002-2003     2 2   4
2003-2004     1     1
2004-2005         1 1
2005-2006     2     2
2006-2007     4     4
GVI
(I. McNeill
incl.)
2002-2003     10 1 1 12
2003-2004     4 2 1 7
2004-2005     9 2 1 12
2005-2006     5 1 2 8
2006-2007   2 14 3 1 20
OOHL 2002-2003     7     7
2003-2004     3 1   4
2004-2005     2   3 5
2005-2006     9 2 1 12
2006-2007     11 1 2 14
RPC 2002-2003     1     1
2003-2004     1     1
2004-2005         1 1
2005-2006            
2006-2007            
EIFW 2002-2003     26 16 3 45
2003-2004   3 46 13 5 67
2004-2005 1   64 20 3 88
2005-2006   3 47 22 6 78
2006-2007   1 54 24 5 84
FVI 2002-2003            
2003-2004     1     1
2004-2005     9   1 10
2005-2006   1 9 1 1 12
2006-2007     11 1 2 14
Total 2002-2003 0 1 48 19 4 72
2003-2004 0 4 59 16 10 89
2004-2005 1 0 85 22 12 120
2005-2006 0 4 79 26 13 122
2006-2007 0 3 97 30 11 141

Source: OMS, as of April 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007

Offence Profile - All Admission Types - Non-Aboriginal

Institution Fiscal Year First
Degree
Murder
Second
Degree
Murder
Sched. I Sched. II Non
Sched.
Total
Nova 2002-2003 0 0 21 6 10 37
2003-2004 0 0 18 11 15 44
2004-2005 0 1 14 2 10 27
2005-2006 0 2 24 6 20 52
2006-2007 1 0 30 9 27 67
Joliette 2002-2003 0 1 15 17 9 42
2003-2004 0 1 23 17 6 47
2004-2005 2 0 27 20 12 61
2005-2006 1 3 25 21 17 67
2006-2007 0 3 26 17 8 54
GVI
(I. McNeill
incl.)
2002-2003 0 0 28 54 8 90
2003-2004 0 0 32 41 16 89
2004-2005 0 1 28 51 23 103
2005-2006 1 3 33 45 22 104
2006-2007 3 4 25 44 22 98
OOHL 2002-2003 0 0 0 0 0 0
2003-2004 0 0 1 0 1 2
2004-2005 0 0 0 1 0 1
2005-2006 0 0 1 0 1 2
2006-2007 0 0 0 5 1 6
RPC 2002-2003 0 0 0 0 0 0
2003-2004 0 0 0 0 0 0
2004-2005 0 0 0 0 0 0
2005-2006 0 0 0 0 1 1
2006-2007 0 0 0 0 0 0
EIFW 2002-2003 0 0 15 24 11 50
2003-2004 0 0 18 25 20 63
2004-2005 1 0 14 20 16 51
2005-2006 0 0 15 29 19 63
2006-2007 0 1 23 28 13 65
FVI 2002-2003 0 0 0 0 0 0
2003-2004 0 0 0 0 0 0
2004-2005 0 0 11 7 5 23
2005-2006 0 2 9 3 7 21
2006-2007 0 2 14 6 8 30
Total 2002-2003 0 1 79 101 38 219
2003-2004 0 1 92 94 58 245
2004-2005 3 2 94 101 66 266
2005-2006 2 10 107 104 87 310
2006-2007 4 10 118 109 79 320

Source: OMS, as of April 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007.

Admissions for Revocation at the Regional Facilities per Fiscal Year

Institution Admissions
for
Revocation
2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007
Nova With offence 1 2   2 5
Without Offence 15 19 14 16 26
Joliette With offence 2 2 4 4 4
Without Offence 11 7 16 23 17
GVI With offence 6 2 11 8 2
Without Offence 23 14 23 26 18
OOHL With offence 3 1 2 3 3
Without Offence 4 4 3 8 11
RPC With offence       1  
Without Offence          
EIFW With offence 4 10 11 12 16
Without Offence 38 49 46 38 26
FVI With offence       1 1
Without Offence   1 9 11 12
 Total With offence 16 17 28 31 31
Without Offence 91 94 111 122 110

Source: OMS, as of April 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007

  • The majority of revocations are without offence;
  • The number of admissions for revocation with offence has increased since fiscal year 2002-2003 to fiscal year 2006-2007 (16-31); Revocations without an offence has decreased since fiscal year 2005-2006 (122 to 110);

Admissions for Revocation at the Regional Facilities per Fiscal Year Aboriginal

Institution Admissions
for
Revocation
2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007
Nova With offence       1  
Without Offence 1 2 1 3 2
Joliette With offence 1        
Without Offence 2     1  
GVI With offence          
Without Offence 2 4 5 2 5
OOHL With offence 3   1 3 3
Without Offence 4 3 3 7 9
RPC With offence          
Without Offence          
EIFW With offence 2 4 8 6 12
Without Offence 19 28 31 24 15
FVI With offence          
Without Offence   1 4 4 6
 Total With offence 6 4 9 10 15
Without Offence 28 38 44 41 37

Source: OMS, as of April 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 March 31, 2007

  • As EIFW has the highest number of Aboriginal women, they also have the highest number of aboriginal women being revoked.

Admissions for Revocation at the Regional Facilities per Fiscal Year Non-Aboriginal

Institution Admissions
for
Revocation
2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007
Nova With offence 1 2 0 1 5
Without Offence 14 17 13 13 24
Joliette With offence 1 2 4 4 4
Without Offence 9 7 16 22 17
GVI With offence 6 2 11 8 2
Without Offence 21 10 18 24 13
OOHL With offence 0 1 1 0 0
Without Offence 0 1 0 1 2
RPC With offence 0 0 0 1 0
Without Offence 0 0 0 0 0
EIFW With offence 2 6 3 6 4
Without Offence 19 21 15 14 11
FVI With offence 0 0 0 1 1
Without Offence 0 0 5 7 6
 Total With offence 10 13 19 21 16
Without Offence 63 56 67 81 73

Source: OMS, as of April 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007.

Admissions for Revocations with Outstanding Charges at the Regional Facilities per Fiscal Year

  • As of June 2000, a new temporary admission type has been added to the Offender Management System, "revocation with outstanding charges". When the charges are resolved, this admission type was modified to show revocation with offence or revocation without offence;
  • As there are too few admissions with outstanding charges at the regional facilities, the data is not included in a table and has not been included in the total number of revocation admissions;
  • In 2006-2007 there were three admissions for revocations with outstanding charges: Edmonton Institution for Women - 2, Fraser Valley Institution -1.

Revocations With Offence by Type of Release

Institution Fiscal Year Day
Parole
Full
Parole
Statutory
Release
Nova 2002-2003 1    
2003-2004 1   1
2004-2005      
2005-2006   1 1
2006-2007 1 2 2
Joliette 2002-2003   1 1
2003-2004     2
2004-2005 1   3
2005-2006 1 1 2
2006-2007 2   2
GVI 2002-2003   4 2
2003-2004 1   1
2004-2005 3 2 6
2005-2006 3 3 2
2006-2007     2
OOHL 2002-2003 1   2
2003-2004   1  
2004-2005 1   1
2005-2006 2   1
2006-2007 1 1 1
EIFW 2002-2003 1 2 1
2003-2004 1 1 8
2004-2005 2 3 6
2005-2006 5 1 6
2006-2007 7 3 6
FVI 2002-2003      
2003-2004      
2004-2005      
2005-2006   1  
2006-2007     1
Total 2002-2003 3 7 6
2003-2004 3 2 12
2004-2005 7 5 16
2005-2006 11 7 12
2006-2007 11 6 14

Source: OMS, as of April 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007

  • When compared to previous fiscal years the number of revocations with offence has increased for both Day Parole (3 to 11) and Statutory Release from (6 to 14). Full Parole Revocations with offence has decreased from 7 to 6.

Revocation With Offence by Type of Release - Aboriginals

Institution Fiscal Year Day
Parole
Full
Parole
Statutory
Release
Nova 2002-2003      
2003-2004      
2004-2005      
2005-2006     1
2006-2007      
Joliette 2002-2003     1
2003-2004      
2004-2005      
2005-2006      
2006-2007      
GVI 2002-2003      
2003-2004      
2004-2005      
2005-2006      
2006-2007      
OOHL 2002-2003 1   2
2003-2004      
2004-2005 1    
2005-2006 2   1
2006-2007 1 1 1
EIFW 2002-2003 1   1
2003-2004     4
2004-2005 1 1 6
2005-2006 2 1 3
2006-2007 6 2 4
FVI 2002-2003      
2003-2004      
2004-2005      
2005-2006      
2006-2007      
Total 2002-2003 2 0 4
2003-2004 0 0 4
2004-2005 2 1 6
2005-2006 4 1 5
2006-2007 7 3 5

Source: OMS, as of April 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007

Revocation With Offence by Type of Release - Non-Aboriginals

Institution Fiscal Year Day
Parole
Full
Parole
Statutory
Release
Nova 2002-2003 1    
2003-2004 1   1
2004-2005      
2005-2006   1  
2006-2007 1 2 2
Joliette 2002-2003   1  
2003-2004     2
2004-2005 1   3
2005-2006 1 1 2
2006-2007 2   2
GVI 2002-2003   4 2
2003-2004 1   1
2004-2005 3 2 6
2005-2006 3 3 2
2006-2007     2
OOHL 2002-2003      
2003-2004   1  
2004-2005     1
2005-2006      
2006-2007      
EIFW 2002-2003   2  
2003-2004 1 1 4
2004-2005 1 2  
2005-2006 3   3
2006-2007 1 1 2
FVI 2002-2003      
2003-2004      
2004-2005      
2005-2006   1  
2006-2007     1
Total 2002-2003 1 7 2
2003-2004 3 2 8
2004-2005 5 4 10
2005-2006 7 6 7
2006-2007 4 3 9

Source: OMS, as of April 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007

Revocations Without Offence by Type of Release

Institution Fiscal Year Day
Parole
Full
Parole
Statutory
Release
Nova 2002-2003 8 2 5
2003-2004 12 1 6
2004-2005 9   5
2005-2006 9 2 5
2006-2007 5 9 12
Joliette 2002-2003 4 3 4
2003-2004 4 1 2
2004-2005 3 7 6
2005-2006 6 2 15
2006-2007 6 5 6
GVI 2002-2003 4 7 12
2003-2004 6 3 5
2004-2005 7 5 11
2005-2006 7 6 13
2006-2007 7 5 6
OOHL 2002-2003 2   2
2003-2004 2 1 1
2004-2005     3
2005-2006 3 1 4
2006-2007 3 4 4
EIFW 2002-2003 12 8 18
2003-2004 17 11 21
2004-2005 17 8 21
2005-2006 14 8 16
2006-2007 5 7 14
FVI 2002-2003      
2003-2004     1
2004-2005 2 4 3
2005-2006 3 1 7
2006-2007 4 2 6
Total 2002-2003 30 20 41
2003-2004 41 17 36
2004-2005 38 24 49
2005-2006 42 20 60
2006-2007 30 32 48

Source: OMS, as of April 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007

  • Women offenders are more likely to be revoked without a new offence while on Statutory Release.

Revocation Without Offence by Type of Release Aboriginal

Institution Fiscal Year Day
Parole
Full
Parole
Statutory
Release
Nova 2002-2003 1    
2003-2004 1 1  
2004-2005 1    
2005-2006 1 1 1
2006-2007   1 1
Joliette 2002-2003     2
2003-2004      
2004-2005      
2005-2006     1
2006-2007      
GVI 2002-2003   1 1
2003-2004 2   2
2004-2005 1   4
2005-2006   1 1
2006-2007 1   4
OOHL 2002-2003 2   2
2003-2004 1 1 1
2004-2005     3
2005-2006 2 1 4
2006-2007 3 2 4
EIFW 2002-2003 5 4 10
2003-2004 10 5 13
2004-2005 12 5 14
2005-2006 11 1 12
2006-2007 4 2 9
FVI 2002-2003      
2003-2004     1
2004-2005 1 2 1
2005-2006 2   2
2006-2007 2   4
Total 2002-2003 8 5 15
2003-2004 14 7 17
2004-2005 15 7 22
2005-2006 16 4 21
2006-2007 10 5 22

Source: OMS, as of April 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007

Revocation Without Offence by Type of Release Non-Aboriginal

Institution Fiscal Year Day
Parole
Full
Parole
Statutory
Release
Nova 2002-2003 7 2 5
2003-2004 11   6
2004-2005 8   5
2005-2006 8 1 4
2006-2007 5 8 11
Joliette 2002-2003 4 3 2
2003-2004 4 1 2
2004-2005 3 7 6
2005-2006 6 2 14
2006-2007 6 5 6
GVI 2002-2003 4 6 11
2003-2004 4 3 3
2004-2005 6 5 7
2005-2006 7 5 12
2006-2007 6 5 2
OOHL 2002-2003      
2003-2004 1    
2004-2005      
2005-2006 1    
2006-2007   2  
EIFW 2002-2003 7 4 8
2003-2004 7 6 8
2004-2005 5 3 7
2005-2006 3 7 4
2006-2007 1 5 5
FVI 2002-2003      
2003-2004      
2004-2005 1 2 2
2005-2006 1 1 5
2006-2007 2 2 2
Total 2002-2003 22 15 26
2003-2004 27 10 19
2004-2005 23 17 27
2005-2006 26 16 39
2006-2007 20 27 26

Source: OMS, as of April 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007

Correctional Plans

Fiscal Year Completed
Correctional
Plan
Completed
On Time
Complete
Late
Not
Completed
2002-2003 185 146 79% 39 21%   0%
2003-2004 241 229 95% 11 5% 1 0%
2004-2005 219 201 92% 18 8%   0%
2005-2006 265 260 98% 5 2%   0%
2006-2007 294 270 92% 22 7% 2 1%

Source: OMS, as of July 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007

Aboriginal

Fiscal Year Completed
Correctional
Plan
Completed
On Time
Complete
Late
Not
Completed
2002-2003 45 32 71% 13 29% 0 0%
2003-2004 55 51 93% 4 7% 0 0%
2004-2005 62 59 95% 3 5% 0 0%
2005-2006 80 80 100%   0% 0 0%
2006-2007 80 76 95% 4 5% 0 0%

Source: OMS, as of July 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007

Non-Aboriginal

Fiscal Year Completed
Correctional
Plan
Completed
On Time
Complete
Late
Not
Completed
2002-2003 140 114 81% 26 19%   0%
2003-2004 186 178 96% 7 4% 1 1%
2004-2005 157 142 90% 15 10%   0%
2005-2006 185 180 97% 5 3%   0%
2006-2007 214 194 91% 18 8% 2 1%

Source: OMS, as of July 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007

  • The time requirements for the completion of the Correctional Plan vary dependant upon the length of sentence. There is a 70-day requirement for sentences of 4 years or less and a 90-day requirement for sentences greater than 4 years (including indeterminate sentences). In both cases, the time frame is measured from the offender's admission date to the date the Correctional Plan is locked. The tables above show the results based upon this standard.

Court Findings for Minor Charges per Institution

Institution Fiscal Year Guilty Not
Guilty
Withdrawn Dismissed Not
Stated
Total
Nova 2002-2003 126 3 43     172
2003-2004 225 20 27     272
2004-2005 211 16 32   2 261
2005-2006 215 5 35 27 1 283
2006-2007 306   24 52 8 390
Joliette 2002-2003 116 5 56     177
2003-2004 199 8 135     342
2004-2005 249 3 90 2 4 348
2005-2006 165 1 71 9   246
2006-2007 172   49 11 4 236
GVI (incl. IMH) 2002-2003 124 2 74   1 201
2003-2004 138 6 130     274
2004-2005 138 5 63     206
2005-2006 135   101 11 3 250
2006-2007 100   62 23 5 190
OOHL 2002-2003 23         23
2003-2004 49   1     50
2004-2005 33   6   1 40
2005-2006 54   1 1   56
2006-2007 22   2     24
RPC Prairies 2002-2003 23 6 22 4   55
2003-2004 38   4 1 2 45
2004-2005 7   1     8
2005-2006 32   4     36
2006-2007 50   6   3 59
EIFW 2002-2003 351 16 47 1 16 431
2003-2004 229 6 11     246
2004-2005 127 10 29     166
2005-2006 223   24 37 6 290
2006-2007 449   31 67 2 549
FVI 2002-2003            
2003-2004            
2004-2005 38 1 26     65
2005-2006 19 1 12     32
2006-2007 68   13 12   93
Total 2002-2003 763 32 242 5 17 1059
2003-2004 878 40 308 1 2 1229
2004-2005 803 35 247 2 7 1094
2005-2006 843 7 248 85 10 1193
2006-2007 1167   187 165 22 1541

Source: OMS, as of July 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007.

  • Of the 1059 minor charges laid during 2002/2003, 763 (72%) resulted in a guilty verdict. The majority of all minor charges laid occurred at Edmonton Institution for Women (431);
  • Of the 1541 minor charges laid during 2006/2007, 1167 (76%) resulted in a guilty verdict. The majority of all minor charges occurred at Edmonton Institution for Women (549) which 82% (449) resulted in a guilty verdict;

Minor Offence: is where an inmate exhibits negative or non-productive behaviour towards institutional rules governing the conduct of inmates. Minor offences are dealt within institutional "minor court" as per Commissioner's Directive 580 Discipline of Inmates.

Court Findings for Minor Charges per Institution - Aboriginal

Institution Fiscal Year Guilty Not
Guilty
Withdrawn Dismissed Not
Stated
Total
Nova 2002-2003 8   6     14
2003-2004 16 2 1     19
2004-2005 28 2 5   1 36
2005-2006 21   3 1   25
2006-2007 23   1 5 2 31
Joliette 2002-2003 7   1     8
2003-2004 15   22     37
2004-2005 33   17     50
2005-2006 16   11 2   29
2006-2007 24   9 1   34
GVI (incl. IMH) 2002-2003 21 1 14     36
2003-2004 40   38     78
2004-2005 19   13     32
2005-2006 24   23 3 1 51
2006-2007 24   13 2   39
OOHL 2002-2003 23         23
2003-2004 46   1     47
2004-2005 33   6   1 40
2005-2006 53   1 1   55
2006-2007 19   2     21
RPC Prairies 2002-2003 22 2 18     42
2003-2004 36   4   2 42
2004-2005 3         3
2005-2006 28   3     31
2006-2007 44   3     47
EIFW 2002-2003 183 9 36   6 234
2003-2004 133 4 5     142
2004-2005 83 1 17     101
2005-2006 149   20 26 5 200
2006-2007 339   18 47 2 406
FVI 2002-2003            
2003-2004            
2004-2005 23 1 13     37
2005-2006 9 1 6     16
2006-2007 39   11 7   57
Total 2002-2003 264 12 75 0 6 357
2003-2004 286 6 71 0 2 365
2004-2005 222 4 71 0 2 299
2005-2006 300 1 67 33 6 407
2006-2007 512 0 57 62 4 635

Source: OMS, as of July 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007

Court Findings for Minor Charges per Institution Non-Aboriginal

Institution Fiscal Year Guilty Not
Guilty
Withdrawn Dismissed Not
Stated
Total
Nova 2002-2003 118 3 37 0 0 158
2003-2004 209 18 26 0 0 253
2004-2005 183 14 27 0 1 225
2005-2006 194 5 32 26 1 258
2006-2007 283 0 23 47 6 359
Joliette 2002-2003 109 5 55 0 0 169
2003-2004 184 8 113 0 0 305
2004-2005 216 3 73 2 4 298
2005-2006 149 1 60 7 0 217
2006-2007 148 0 40 10 4 202
GVI (incl. IMH) 2002-2003 103 1 60 0 1 165
2003-2004 98 6 92 0 0 196
2004-2005 119 5 50 0 0 174
2005-2006 111 0 78 8 2 199
2006-2007 76 0 49 21 5 151
OOHL 2002-2003 0 0 0 0 0 0
2003-2004 3 0 0 0 0 3
2004-2005 0 0 0 0 0 0
2005-2006 1 0 0 0 0 1
2006-2007 3 0 0 0 0 3
RPC Prairies 2002-2003 1 4 4 4 0 13
2003-2004 2 0 0 1 0 3
2004-2005 4 0 1 0 0 5
2005-2006 4 0 1 0 0 5
2006-2007 6 0 3 0 3 12
EIFW 2002-2003 168 7 11 1 10 197
2003-2004 96 2 6 0 0 104
2004-2005 44 9 12 0 0 65
2005-2006 74 0 4 11 1 90
2006-2007 110 0 13 20 0 143
FVI 2002-2003 0 0 0 0 0 0
2003-2004 0 0 0 0 0 0
2004-2005 15 0 13 0 0 28
2005-2006 10 0 6 0 0 16
2006-2007 29 0 2 5 0 36
Total 2002-2003 499 20 167 5 11 702
2003-2004 592 34 237 1   864
2004-2005 581 31 176 2 5 795
2005-2006 543 6 181 52 4 786
2006-2007 655   130 103 18 906

Source: OMS, as of July 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007

Court Findings for Serious Charges per Institution

Institution Fiscal Year Guilty Not
Guilty
Withdrawn Dismissed Not
Stated
Total
Nova 2002-2003 51 11 19     81
2003-2004 171 23 21   2 217
2004-2005 63 5 7     75
2005-2006 75   9 19   103
2006-2007 77   1 20 3 101
Joliette 2002-2003 29 5 11     45
2003-2004 62 4 17     83
2004-2005 35 2 22 1   60
2005-2006 48   16 1   65
2006-2007 140   21 2 2 165
GVI
(incl. IMH)
2002-2003 44 1 95   2 142
2003-2004 39 2 46   1 88
2004-2005 62 2 68     132
2005-2006 43   72 26   141
2006-2007 62   46 7 3 118
OOHL 2002-2003 4   1     5
2003-2004            
2004-2005            
2005-2006 1         1
2006-2007            
RPC Prairies 2002-2003 7   3   2 12
2003-2004 3   2     5
2004-2005 1   1     2
2005-2006 6     1   7
2006-2007 15   1   3 19
EIFW 2002-2003 69 13 34   17 133
2003-2004 94 12 46   15 167
2004-2005 55   34     89
2005-2006 46   20 6   72
2006-2007 82   22 11 2 117
FVI 2002-2003            
2003-2004            
2004-2005 11   5   1 17
2005-2006 9   6 2   17
2006-2007 31   2 7 4 44
Total 2002-2003 204 30 163   21 418
2003-2004 369 41 132   18 560
2004-2005 227 9 137 1 1 375
2005-2006 228   123 55   406
2006-2007 407   93 47 17 564

Source: OMS, as of July 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007.

  • Of the 418 serious charges during 2002/2003, 204 (49%) resulted in a guilty verdict. The majority of all serious charges occurred at Grand Valley Institution;
  • Of the 564 serious charges during 2006/2007, 407 (72%) resulted in a guilty verdict. The majority of all serious charges occurred at Joliette (165) and 85% (140) resulted in a guilty verdict.

Serious Offence: where an inmate commits a serious breach of security, exhibits violent behaviour, commits or attempts to commit an act that could generate such behaviour on the part of others, or could cause harmful consequences to staff members or inmates. Serious offences are dealt with in institutional "disciplinary court" as per Commissioner's Directive 580 Discipline of Inmates.

Court Findings for Serious Charges per Institution Aboriginal

Institution Fiscal Year Guilty Not
Guilty
Withdrawn Dismissed Not
Stated
Total
Nova 2002-2003 3 2       5
2003-2004 9 1 2     12
2004-2005            
2005-2006 13     4   17
2006-2007 3   1 1   5
Joliette 2002-2003 4   1     5
2003-2004 1   1     2
2004-2005 13   1     14
2005-2006 7   2     9
2006-2007 17       1 18
GVI
(incl. IMH)
2002-2003 11 1 20     32
2003-2004 14   10   1 25
2004-2005 10   24     34
2005-2006 11   15 2   28
2006-2007 10   8 3   21
OOHL 2002-2003 4   1     5
2003-2004            
2004-2005            
2005-2006            
2006-2007            
RPC Prairies 2002-2003 4   2     6
2003-2004 2   2     4
2004-2005     1     1
2005-2006 4     1   5
2006-2007 7         7
EIFW 2002-2003 39 6 31   7 83
2003-2004 58 7 31   5 101
2004-2005 32   20     52
2005-2006 34   9 4   47
2006-2007 68   14 8 2 92
FVI 2002-2003            
2003-2004            
2004-2005 6   4     10
2005-2006 5   5     10
2006-2007 14   2 4 1 21
Total 2002-2003 65 9 55 0 7 136
2003-2004 84 8 46 0 6 144
2004-2005 61 0 50 0 0 111
2005-2006 74 0 31 11 0 116
2006-2007 119 0 25 16 4 164

Source: OMS, as of July 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007.

  • Aboriginal women account for 29% of all guilty verdicts in fiscal year 2006-2007.

Court Findings for Serious Charges per Institution Non-Aboriginal

Institution Fiscal Year Guilty Not
Guilty
Withdrawn Dismissed Not
Stated
Total
Nova 2002-2003 48 9 19     76
2003-2004 162 22 19   2 205
2004-2005 63 5 7     75
2005-2006 62   9 15   86
2006-2007 74     19 3 96
Joliette 2002-2003 25 5 10     40
2003-2004 61 4 16     81
2004-2005 22 2 21 1   46
2005-2006 41   14 1   56
2006-2007 123   21 2 1 147
GVI
(incl. IMH)
2002-2003 33   75   2 110
2003-2004 25 2 36     63
2004-2005 52 2 44     98
2005-2006 32   57 24   113
2006-2007 52   38 4 3 97
OOHL 2002-2003            
2003-2004            
2004-2005            
2005-2006 1         1
2006-2007            
RPC Prairies 2002-2003 3   1   2 6
2003-2004 1         1
2004-2005 1         1
2005-2006 2         2
2006-2007 8   1   3 12
EIFW 2002-2003 30 7 3   10 50
2003-2004 36 5 15   10 66
2004-2005 23   14     37
2005-2006 12   11 2   25
2006-2007 14   8 3   25
FVI 2002-2003            
2003-2004            
2004-2005 5   1   1 7
2005-2006 4   1 2   7
2006-2007 17     3 3 23
Total 2002-2003 139 21 108   14 282
2003-2004 285 33 86   12 416
2004-2005 166 9 87 1 1 264
2005-2006 154   92 44   290
2006-2007 288   68 31 13 400

Source: OMS, as of July 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007.

Admissions into Administrative Segregation

Institution Fiscal Year Involuntary Voluntary Disciplinary Total
Nova 2002-2003 15 5   20
2003-2004 63 31 2 96
2004-2005 45 11 1 57
2005-2006 72 8   80
2006-2007 81 6   87
Joliette 2002-2003 15 7   22
2003-2004 64 3   67
2004-2005 74 3 11 88
2005-2006 52 12 10 74
2006-2007 54 12 11 77
GVI 2002-2003 18   2 20
2003-2004 58 3 1 62
2004-2005 56 3 2 61
2005-2006 74 9   83
2006-2007 46 3 2 51
EIFW 2002-2003 31 1   32
2003-2004 57 3 1 61
2004-2005 50 4   54
2005-2006 66 4   70
2006-2007 62 2   64
FVI 2002-2003        
2003-2004        
2004-2005 21 4   25
2005-2006 21 2 1 24
2006-2007 44 5 6 55
Total 2002-2003 79 13 2 94
2003-2004 242 40 4 286
2004-2005 246 25 14 285
2005-2006 285 35 11 331
2006-2007 287 28 19 334

Source: OMS, as of July 29, 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007.

  • In 2006-2007, the majority of involuntary admissions to administrative segregation occurred at Nova (81), Edmonton Institution for Women (62) and Joliette (54);

Admissions into Administrative Segregation - Aboriginal

Institution Fiscal Year Involuntary Voluntary Disciplinary Total
Nova 2002-2003 1     1
2003-2004 5     5
2004-2005 5     5
2005-2006 13 3   16
2006-2007 10     10
Joliette 2002-2003 1     1
2003-2004 4     4
2004-2005 4   5 9
2005-2006 10 1 6 17
2006-2007 8   1 9
GVI 2002-2003 5   1 6
2003-2004 17 2   19
2004-2005 9     9
2005-2006 11     11
2006-2007 12     12
EIFW 2002-2003 18 1   19
2003-2004 38 2 1 41
2004-2005 34 4   38
2005-2006 45 2   47
2006-2007 48 1   49
FVI 2002-2003        
2003-2004        
2004-2005 15 1   16
2005-2006 8   1 9
2006-2007 26 1 2 29
Total 2002-2003 25 1 1 27
2003-2004 64 4 1 69
2004-2005 67 5 5 77
2005-2006 87 6 7 100
2006-2007 104 2 3 109

Source: OMS, as of July 29, 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007.

  • Aboriginal women offenders account for 33% of all admissions to segregation and 36% of all involuntary admissions to segregation in 2006-2007.

Admissions into Administrative Segregation - Non-Aboriginal

Institution Fiscal Year Involuntary Voluntary Disciplinary Total
Nova 2002-2003 14 5   19
2003-2004 58 31 2 91
2004-2005 40 11 1 52
2005-2006 59 5   64
2006-2007 71 6   77
Joliette 2002-2003 14 7   21
2003-2004 60 3   63
2004-2005 70 3 6 79
2005-2006 42 11 4 57
2006-2007 46 12 10 68
GVI 2002-2003 13   1 14
2003-2004 41 1 1 43
2004-2005 47 3 2 52
2005-2006 63 9   72
2006-2007 34 3 2 39
EIFW 2002-2003 13     13
2003-2004 19 1   20
2004-2005 16     16
2005-2006 21 2   23
2006-2007 14 1   15
FVI 2002-2003        
2003-2004        
2004-2005 6 3   9
2005-2006 13 2   15
2006-2007 18 4 4 26
Total 2002-2003 54 12 1 67
2003-2004 178 36 3 217
2004-2005 179 20 9 208
2005-2006 198 29 4 231
2006-2007 183 26 16 225

Source: OMS, as of July 29, 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007.

Number of Days spent in Segregation for all types of admissions into segregation

Institution Fiscal Year 2 days
or less
3-5
days
6-10
days
Over
10 days
Total
Nova 2002-2003 3 8 7 2 20
2003-2004 43 24 10 19 96
2004-2005 8 19 15 15 57
2005-2006 12 22 21 25 80
2006-2007 8 21 25 33 87
Joliette 2002-2003   4 12 6 22
2003-2004 6 12 27 22 67
2004-2005 5 32 36 15 88
2005-2006 8 26 20 20 74
2006-2007 13 15 28 21 77
GVI 2002-2003 6 6 7 1 20
2003-2004 10 20 16 16 62
2004-2005 6 25 12 18 61
2005-2006 13 28 30 12 83
2006-2007 7 15 13 16 51
EIFW 2002-2003 9 10 4 9 32
2003-2004 8 16 20 17 61
2004-2005 4 13 17 20 54
2005-2006 7 8 22 33 70
2006-2007 6 6 22 30 64
FVI 2002-2003          
2003-2004          
2004-2005 3 3 4 15 25
2005-2006 3 2 12 7 24
2006-2007 10 7 20 18 55
Total 2002-2003 18 28 30 18 94
2003-2004 67 72 73 74 286
2004-2005 26 92 84 83 285
2005-2006 43 86 105 97 331
2006-2007 44 64 108 118 334

Source: OMS, as of July 29, 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007.

  • During 2006-2007 the majority of placement in administrative segregation was for over 10 days (118 placements), followed by 6 to 10 days (108 placements);

Number of Days spent in Segregation for all types of admissions into segregation - Aboriginal

Institution Fiscal Year 2 days
or less
3-5
days
6-10
days
Over
10 days
Total
Nova 2002-2003   1     1
2003-2004 1     4 5
2004-2005   3 2   5
2005-2006 2 5 3 6 16
2006-2007   1 4 5 10
Joliette 2002-2003     1   1
2003-2004 2 1   1 4
2004-2005   5 3 1 9
2005-2006 1 10   6 17
2006-2007 1   5 3 9
GVI 2002-2003 1 3 2   6
2003-2004 5 7 3 4 19
2004-2005   3 1 5 9
2005-2006 1 5 4 1 11
2006-2007 2 2 2 6 12
EIFW 2002-2003 4 4 3 8 19
2003-2004 5 10 13 13 41
2004-2005 4 7 14 13 38
2005-2006 4 7 12 24 47
2006-2007 4 5 17 23 49
FVI 2002-2003          
2003-2004          
2004-2005 2 2 2 10 16
2005-2006   2 3 4 9
2006-2007 2 4 12 11 29
Totals 2002-2003 5 8 6 8 27
2003-2004 13 18 16 22 69
2004-2005 6 20 22 29 77
2005-2006 8 29 22 41 100
2006-2007 9 12 40 48 109

Source: OMS, as of July 29, 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007.

Number of Days spent in Segregation for all types of admissions into segregation - Non-Aboriginal

Institution Fiscal Year 2 days
or less
3-5
days
6-10
days
Over
10 days
Total
Nova 2002-2003 3 7 7 2 19
2003-2004 42 24 10 15 91
2004-2005 8 16 13 15 52
2005-2006 10 17 18 19 64
2006-2007 8 20 21 28 77
Joliette 2002-2003   4 11 6 21
2003-2004 4 11 27 21 63
2004-2005 5 27 33 14 79
2005-2006 7 16 20 14 57
2006-2007 12 15 23 18 68
GVI 2002-2003 5 3 5 1 14
2003-2004 5 13 13 12 43
2004-2005 6 22 11 13 52
2005-2006 12 23 26 11 72
2006-2007 5 13 11 10 39
EIFW 2002-2003 5 6 1 1 13
2003-2004 3 6 7 4 20
2004-2005   6 3 7 16
2005-2006 3 1 10 9 23
2006-2007 2 1 5 7 15
FVI 2002-2003          
2003-2004          
2004-2005 1 1 2 5 9
2005-2006 3   9 3 15
2006-2007 8 3 8 7 26
Totals 2002-2003 13 20 24 10 67
2003-2004 54 54 57 52 217
2004-2005 20 72 62 54 208
2005-2006 35 57 83 56 231
2006-2007 35 52 68 70 225

Source: OMS, as of July 29, 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007.

Escorted Temporary Absences

Institution Fiscal Year Regular
and
Admin.
Program Community
Services
Parental,
Family
contact and
compassionate
Medical Total
Nova 2002-2003 3 58   42 279 382
2003-2004   36   41 313 390
2004-2005 1 26 4 49 325 405
2005-2006 3 31 10 45 331 420
2006-2007 1 34 4 42 355 436
Joliette 2002-2003 3 47 8 86 216 360
2003-2004 4 54 3 92 236 389
2004-2005   60 4 42 254 360
2005-2006 2 18 6 60 204 290
2006-2007   55 30 78 215 378
GVI
(incl. IMH)
2002-2003 115 498 71 101 491 1276
2003-2004 156 539 36 132 454 1317
2004-2005 164 374 55 92 500 1185
2005-2006 124 387 77 99 481 1168
2006-2007 73 508 60 149 446 1236
OOHL 2002-2003 3 191   5 195 394
2003-2004 8 177   19 238 442
2004-2005 17 92   44 254 407
2005-2006   235   24 271 530
2006-2007 6 295   22 312 635
RPC Prairies 2002-2003 1 3   9 217 230
2003-2004   2   4 208 214
2004-2005   8   4 205 217
2005-2006 2 11   8 259 280
2006-2007   7   6 284 297
EIFW 2002-2003 1 359 7 26 294 687
2003-2004 1 218 4 59 280 562
2004-2005 3 269 5 37 329 643
2005-2006 5 307 1 37 248 598
2006-2007 3 123   57 331 514
FVI 2002-2003            
2003-2004         4 4
2004-2005 6 449   91 239 785
2005-2006 26 670   39 212 947
2006-2007 1 616   68 210 895
Totals 2002-2003 126 1156 86 269 1692 3329
2003-2004 169 1026 43 347 1733 3318
2004-2005 191 1278 68 359 2106 4002
2005-2006 162 1659 94 312 2006 4233
2006-2007 84 1638 94 422 2153 4391

Source: OMS, as of July 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007.

  • The number of program ETA has increased since 2002-2003.

Successful Temporary Absences include those where an offender has not gone unlawfully at large nor have they been detained by the police. Data represents the total number of permits and not the number of offenders.

Escorted Temporary Absences - Aboriginal

Institution Fiscal Year Regular
and
Admin.
Program Community
Services
Parental,
Family
contact and
compassionate
Medical Total
Nova 2002-2003   10   12 29 51
2003-2004   2     15 17
2004-2005   12   14 66 92
2005-2006   13 7 4 67 91
2006-2007   5   1 44 50
Joliette 2002-2003   1   1 13 15
2003-2004   1   2 22 25
2004-2005   8   4 23 35
2005-2006         28 28
2006-2007     3   28 31
GVI (incl. IMH) 2002-2003 2 11 8 7 67 95
2003-2004 4 79 11 18 71 183
2004-2005 9 74 7 2 96 188
2005-2006 3 74 10 1 89 177
2006-2007 2 57 4 1 65 129
OOHL 2002-2003 2 143   3 171 319
2003-2004 5 171   15 223 414
2004-2005 15 81   40 231 367
2005-2006   217   23 237 477
2006-2007 5 245   19 238 507
RPC Prairies 2002-2003 1 3   9 94 107
2003-2004   1   3 97 101
2004-2005       2 111 113
2005-2006 1 10   5 84 100
2006-2007   2   6 112 120
EIFW 2002-2003 1 205 5 12 142 365
2003-2004 1 106 1 21 168 297
2004-2005 3 176 1 12 207 399
2005-2006 5 182   15 149 351
2006-2007 3 62   9 174 248
FVI 2002-2003            
2003-2004         2 2
2004-2005 1 138   18 95 252
2005-2006 1 149   9 77 236
2006-2007   258   23 94 375
Totals 2002-2003 6 373 13 44 516 952
2003-2004 10 360 12 59 598 1039
2004-2005 28 489 8 92 829 1446
2005-2006 10 645 17 57 731 1460
2006-2007 10 629 7 59 755 1460

Source: OMS, as of July 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007.

Escorted Temporary Absences - Non-Aboriginal

Institution Fiscal Year Regular
and
Admin.
Program Community
Services
Parental,
Family
contact and
compassionate
Medical Total
Nova 2002-2003 3 48   30 250 331
2003-2004   34   41 298 373
2004-2005 1 14 4 35 259 313
2005-2006 3 18 3 41 264 329
2006-2007 1 29 4 41 311 386
Joliette 2002-2003 3 46 8 85 203 345
2003-2004 4 53 3 90 214 364
2004-2005   52 4 38 231 325
2005-2006 2 18 6 60 176 262
2006-2007   55 27 78 187 347
GVI (incl. IMH) 2002-2003 113 487 63 94 424 1181
2003-2004 152 460 25 114 383 1134
2004-2005 155 300 48 90 404 997
2005-2006 121 313 67 98 392 991
2006-2007 71 451 56 148 381 1107
OOHL 2002-2003 1 48   2 24 75
2003-2004 3 6   4 15 28
2004-2005 2 11   4 23 40
2005-2006   18   1 34 53
2006-2007 1 50   3 74 128
RPC Prairies 2002-2003         123 123
2003-2004   1   1 111 113
2004-2005   8   2 94 104
2005-2006 1 1   3 175 180
2006-2007   5     172 177
EIFW 2002-2003   154 2 14 152 322
2003-2004   112 3 38 112 265
2004-2005   93 4 25 122 244
2005-2006   125 1 22 99 247
2006-2007   61   48 157 266
FVI 2002-2003            
2003-2004         2 2
2004-2005 5 311   73 144 533
2005-2006 25 521   30 135 711
2006-2007 1 358   45 116 520
Totals 2002-2003 120 783 73 225 1176 2377
2003-2004 159 666 31 288 1135 2279
2004-2005 163 789 60 267 1277 2556
2005-2006 152 1014 77 255 1275 2773
2006-2007 74 1009 87 363 1398 2931

Source: OMS, as of July 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007.

Unescorted Temporary Absences

Institution Fiscal Year Regular
and
Admin.
Program Community
Services
Parental,
Family
contact and
compassionate
Medical Total
Nova 2002-2003 2 4   8   14
2003-2004   48   1   49
2004-2005   3   5   8
2005-2006 1 9   4   14
2006-2007 3 8   7   18
Joliette 2002-2003 2 4   12 3 21
2003-2004   6 2 34 3 45
2004-2005   23 2 32 2 59
2005-2006   10 1 30 5 46
2006-2007 17 9 3 30 2 61
GVI (incl. IMH) 2002-2003 6 11   18   35
2003-2004 22 19   13   54
2004-2005 29 5   28   62
2005-2006 14 1   11   26
2006-2007 19 1   13   33
OOHL 2002-2003   7   10   17
2003-2004 1 4   6   11
2004-2005   1   13   14
2005-2006       11   11
2006-2007       3   3
RPC Prairies 2002-2003            
2003-2004            
2004-2005            
2005-2006            
2006-2007         1 1
EIFW 2002-2003   54 2 19 7 82
2003-2004 1 14   33 1 49
2004-2005 3 72 8 22   105
2005-2006   87   12   99
2006-2007   68 1 27   96
FVI 2002-2003            
2003-2004            
2004-2005   18       18
2005-2006   20   5   25
2006-2007   9   18   27
Totals 2002-2003 10 80 2 67 10 169
2003-2004 24 91 2 87 4 208
2004-2005 32 122 10 100 2 266
2005-2006 15 127 1 73 5 221
2006-2007 39 95 4 98 3 239

Source: OMS, as of July 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007.

  • The number of program UTA has decreased since 2005-2006.

Unescorted Temporary Absences - Aboriginal

Institution Fiscal Year Regular
and
Admin.
Program Community
Services
Parental,
Family
contact and
compassionate
Medical Total
Nova 2002-2003 2     1   3
2003-2004            
2004-2005   1   3   4
2005-2006 1 3   3   7
2006-2007   1   2   3
Joliette 2002-2003            
2003-2004            
2004-2005     1 2   3
2005-2006            
2006-2007            
GVI (incl. IMH) 2002-2003   4       4
2003-2004   4       4
2004-2005 11     2   13
2005-2006 2 1       3
2006-2007 3         3
OOHL 2002-2003   3   7   10
2003-2004 1 4   6   11
2004-2005   1   10   11
2005-2006       11   11
2006-2007       2   2
RPC Prairies 2002-2003   24   2 7 33
2003-2004   4   8   12
2004-2005   33   2   35
2005-2006   36   2   38
2006-2007   29 1 9   39
EIFW 2002-2003            
2003-2004            
2004-2005            
2005-2006   1   2   3
2006-2007   4   11   15
FVI 2002-2003 2     1   3
2003-2004            
2004-2005   1   3   4
2005-2006 1 3   3   7
2006-2007   1   2   3
Totals 2002-2003 2 31   10 7 50
2003-2004 1 12   14   27
2004-2005 11 35 1 19   66
2005-2006 3 41   18   62
2006-2007 3 34 1 24   62

Source: OMS, as of July 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007.

Unescorted Temporary Absences - Non-Aboriginal

Institution Fiscal Year Regular
and
Admin.
Program Community
Services
Parental,
Family
contact and
compassionate
Medical Total
Nova 2002-2003   4   7   11
2003-2004   48   1   49
2004-2005   2   2   4
2005-2006   6   1   7
2006-2007 3 7   5   15
Joliette 2002-2003 2 4   12 3 21
2003-2004   6 2 34 3 45
2004-2005   23 1 30 2 56
2005-2006   10 1 30 5 46
2006-2007 17 9 3 30 2 61
GVI (incl. IMH) 2002-2003 6 7   18   31
2003-2004 22 15   13   50
2004-2005 18 5   26   49
2005-2006 12     11   23
2006-2007 16 1   13   30
OOHL 2002-2003   4   3   7
2003-2004            
2004-2005       3   3
2005-2006            
2006-2007       1   1
RPC Prairies 2002-2003            
2003-2004            
2004-2005            
2005-2006            
2006-2007         1 1
EIFW 2002-2003   30 2 17   49
2003-2004 1 10   25 1 37
2004-2005 3 39 8 20   70
2005-2006   51   10   61
2006-2007   39   18   57
FVI 2002-2003            
2003-2004            
2004-2005   18       18
2005-2006   19   3   22
2006-2007   5   7   12
Totals 2002-2003 8 49 2 57 3 119
2003-2004 23 79 2 73 4 181
2004-2005 21 87 9 81 2 200
2005-2006 12 86 1 55 5 159
2006-2007 36 61 3 74 3 177

Source: OMS, as of July 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007.

Work Releases

Institution Fiscal Year Program
Nova 2002-2003  
2003-2004  
2004-2005 5
2005-2006 3
2006-2007 7
Joliette 2002-2003 12
2003-2004 6
2004-2005 4
2005-2006 7
2006-2007 7
GVI (incl. IMH) 2002-2003 34
2003-2004  
2004-2005 13
2005-2006 75
2006-2007 105
OOHL 2002-2003 3
2003-2004  
2004-2005  
2005-2006  
2006-2007  
EIFW 2002-2003 8
2003-2004 7
2004-2005 1
2005-2006 44
2006-2007 7
FVI 2002-2003  
2003-2004  
2004-2005 3
2005-2006 4
2006-2007  
Totals 2002-2003 57
2003-2004 13
2004-2005 26
2005-2006 133
2006-2007 126

Source: OMS, as of July 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007.

  • The number of work releases increased since 2002-2003.

Successful Work Releases include those where an offender has not gone unlawfully at large nor have they been detained by the police. Data represents the total number of permits and not the number of offenders.

Work Releases - Aboriginal

Institution Fiscal Year Program
Nova 2002-2003  
2003-2004  
2004-2005 1
2005-2006  
2006-2007  
Joliette 2002-2003  
2003-2004  
2004-2005  
2005-2006  
2006-2007  
GVI (incl. IMH) 2002-2003  
2003-2004  
2004-2005 1
2005-2006 17
2006-2007 29
OOHL 2002-2003  
2003-2004  
2004-2005  
2005-2006  
2006-2007  
EIFW 2002-2003 1
2003-2004 2
2004-2005  
2005-2006 13
2006-2007  
FVI 2002-2003  
2003-2004  
2004-2005  
2005-2006  
2006-2007  
Totals 2002-2003 1
2003-2004 2
2004-2005 2
2005-2006 30
2006-2007 29

Source: OMS, as of July 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007.

Work Releases - Non-Aboriginal

Institution Fiscal Year Program
Nova 2002-2003  
2003-2004  
2004-2005 4
2005-2006 3
2006-2007 7
Joliette 2002-2003 12
2003-2004 6
2004-2005 4
2005-2006 7
2006-2007 7
GVI (incl. IMH) 2002-2003 34
2003-2004  
2004-2005 12
2005-2006 58
2006-2007 76
OOHL 2002-2003 3
2003-2004  
2004-2005  
2005-2006  
2006-2007  
EIFW 2002-2003 7
2003-2004 5
2004-2005 1
2005-2006 31
2006-2007 7
FVI 2002-2003  
2003-2004  
2004-2005 3
2005-2006 4
2006-2007  
Totals 2002-2003 56
2003-2004 11
2004-2005 24
2005-2006 103
2006-2007 97

Source: OMS, as of July 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007.

Offenders Incarcerated Past DPED and Prior to FPED Population As of April 1, 2007

Offenders Incarcerated Past DPED and Prior to FPED Total %
Total Women Offenders who are past DPED but prior to FPED  (In the community and incarcerated) 112 100.0%
Total women offenders that are incarcerated past their DPED and Prior to FPED 50 44.6%
Of the 50 women offenders, 2 had a prior supervision period 2 1.8%
  • Remaining
48 42.9%
Of the 48 left, 5 had a prior day or full parole decisions 5 4.5%
  • Remaining
43 38.4%
Of the 43 left, 30 had a prior day or full parole waivers, postponements or withdrawals 30 26.8%
  • Women who did not get a file review by NPB
13 11.6%

Source: OMS, Snapshot as of April 1, 2007.

  • There were 13 (11.6%) women offenders who were incarcerated past their Day Parole eligibility date but prior to their Full Parole eligibility date who had not had their file reviewed by the National Parole Board;

Only federal offenders are considered for the analysis. Incarcerated is defined as only those offenders with an offender status of "incarcerated".

Aboriginal Offenders Incarcerated Past DPED and Prior to FPED Population As of April 1, 2007

Aboriginal Offenders Incarcerated Past DPED and Prior to FPED Total %
Total Women Offenders who are past DPED but prior to FPED  (In the community and incarcerated) 25 100.0%
Total women offenders that are incarcerated past their DPED and Prior to FPED 13 52.0%
Of the 13 women offenders, 1 had a prior supervision period 1 4.0%
  • Remaining
12 48.0%
Of the 12 left, none had a prior day or full parole decisions 0 0.0%
  • Remaining
12 48.0%
Of the 12 left, 11 had a prior day or full parole waivers, postponements or withdrawals 11 44.0%
  • Women who did not get a file review by NPB
1 4.0%

Source: OMS, Snapshot as of April 1, 2007

Non-Aboriginal

Non-Aboriginal Offenders Incarcerated Past DPED and Prior to FPED Total %
Total Women Offenders who are past DPED but prior to FPED  (In the community and incarcerated) 87 100.0%
Total women offenders that are incarcerated past their DPED and Prior to FPED 37 42.5%
Of the 37 women offenders, none had a prior supervision period 1 1.1%
  • Remaining
36 41.4%
Of the 36 left, 5 had a prior day or full parole decisions 5 5.7%
  • Remaining
31 35.6%
Of the 31 left, 19 had a prior day or full parole waivers, postponements or withdrawals 19 21.8%
  • Women who did not get a file review by NPB
12 13.8%

Source: OMS, Snapshot as of April 1, 2007

Offender Incarcerated Past FPED and Prior to SRD Population As of April 1, 2007

Offender Incarcerated Past FPED and Prior to SRD Total %
Total Women Offenders who are past FPED but prior to DPED  (In the community and incarcerated) 434 100.0%
Total women offenders that are incarcerated past their FPED and Prior to Statutory Release 192 44.2%
Of the 192 women offenders, 69 had a prior supervision period 69 15.9%
  • Remaining
123 28.3%
Of the 123 left, 48 had a prior day or full parole decisions 48 11.1%
  • Remaining
75 17.3%
Of the 75 left, 73 had a prior day or full parole waivers, postponements or withdrawals 73 16.8%
  • Women who did not get a file review by NPB
2 0.5%

Source: OMS, Snapshot as of April 1, 2007

  • There were 2 (0.5%) women offenders who were incarcerated past their Full Parole eligibility who had not had their file reviewed by the National Parole Board;

Only federal offenders are considered for the analysis. Incarcerated is defined as only those offenders with an offender status of "incarcerated".

Aboriginal Offender Incarcerated Past FPED and Prior to SRD Population As of April 1, 2007

Aboriginal Offender Incarcerated Past FPED and Prior to SRD Total %
Total Women Offenders who are past FPED but prior to DPED  (In the community and incarcerated) 120 100.0%
Total women offenders that are incarcerated past their FPED and Prior to Statutory Release 73 60.8%
Of the 73 women offenders, 22 had a prior supervision period 22 18.3%
  • Remaining
51 42.5%
Of the 51 left, 17 had a prior day or full parole decisions 17 14.2%
  • Remaining
34 28.3%
Of the 34 left, 34 had a prior day or full parole waivers, postponements or withdrawals 34 28.3%
  • Women who did not get a file review by NPB
0 0.0%

Source: OMS, Snapshot as of April 1, 2007

Non-Aboriginal

Non-Aboriginal Offender Incarcerated Past FPED and Prior to SRD Total %
Total Women Offenders who are past DPED but prior to FPED  (In the community and incarcerated) 314 100.0%
Total women offenders that are incarcerated past their DPED and Prior to FPED 119 37.9%
Of the 119 women offenders, 47 had a prior supervision period 47 15.0%
  • Remaining
72 22.9%
Of the 72 left, 31 had a prior day or full parole decisions 31 9.9%
  • Remaining
41 13.1%
Of the 41 left, 39 had a prior day or full parole waivers, postponements or withdrawals 39 12.4%
  • Women who did not get a file review by NPB
2 0.6%

Source: OMS, Snapshot as of April 1, 2007

Day Parole Waivers, Postponements and Adjournments Fiscal year 2006/2007

Region Review
Scheduled
Withdrawn Postponements Adjournments
Atlantic 65 9 17  
Québec 48 1 4 1
Ontario 141 13 20  
Prairies 172 10 27 8
Pacific 67 5 8 3
Total 493 38 (2%) 76 (15%) 12 (2%)

Source: OMS, as of April 8, 2007. Data from April 1, 2006 to March 31, 2007.

Aboriginal

Region Review
Scheduled
Withdrawn Postponements Adjournments
Atlantic 8 0 2  
Québec 1 0    
Ontario 12 3 2  
Prairies 109 9 20 6
Pacific 24 1 6 1
Total 154 13 (8%) 30 (19%) 7 (5%)

Source: OMS, as of April 8, 2007. Data from April 1, 2006 to March 31, 2007

Non-Aboriginal

Region Review
Scheduled
Withdrawn Postponements Adjournments
Atlantic 57 9 15  
Québec 47 1 4 1
Ontario 129 10 18  
Prairies 63 1 7 2
Pacific 43 4 2 2
Total 339 25 (3.5%) 46 (14%) 5 (1%)

Source: OMS, as of April 8, 2007. Data from April 1, 2006 to March 31, 2007.

The numbers presented are calculated as the percentage of Day Parole and Full Parole reviews scheduled during the fiscal year that resulted in a withdrawal, postponement or adjournment. Reviews cancelled or entered in error are not included. Adjournments include recorded decisions where the final decision is "Adjourned" and "Administratively Adjourned".

Full Parole Waivers, Postponements and Adjournments - Fiscal year 2006/2007

Region Review
Scheduled
Waivers Postponements Adjournments
Atlantic 68 17 10  
Québec 93 8 23 3
Ontario 144 44 8  
Prairies 186 41 24 8
Pacific 57 15 14 1
Total 548 125 (23%) 79 (14%) 12 (2%)

Source: OMS, as of April 8, 2007. Data from April 1, 2006 to March 31, 2007

Aboriginal

Region Review
Scheduled
Waivers Postponements Adjournments
Atlantic 9 1 3  
Québec 5 1 1  
Ontario 14 9    
Prairies 120 32 19 6
Pacific 18 6 5 1
Total 166 49 (30%) 28 (17%) 7 (4%)

Source: OMS, as of April 8, 2007. Data from April 1, 2006 to March 31, 2007.

Non-Aboriginal

Region Review
Scheduled
Waivers Postponements Adjournments
Atlantic 59 16 7  
Québec 88 7 22 3
Ontario 130 35 8  
Prairies 66 9 5 2
Pacific 39 9 9  
Total 382 76 (20%) 51 (13%) 5 (1%)

Source: OMS, as of April 8, 2007. Data from April 1, 2006 to March 31, 2007.

The numbers presented are calculated as the percentage of Day Parole and Full Parole reviews scheduled during the fiscal year that resulted in a waiver, postponement or adjournment. Reviews cancelled or entered in error are not included. Adjournments include recorded decisions where the final decision is "Adjourned" and "Administratively Adjourned".

Community Temporary Detention and Deportation

Date Temporary
Detained
Deportation
March 31, 2002 43 33
March 31, 2003 39 29
March 31, 2004 40 21
March 31, 2005 56 24
March 31, 2006 52 21
March 31, 2007 41 19

Source: CRS, as of April, 2007.

  • The number of women offenders temporarily detained at the time of the snapshot has decreased since March 2005;
  • The number of women offenders who deported at the time of the snapshot has decreased since March 2002.

Aboriginals

Date Temporary
Detained
Deportation
March 31, 2002 13 0
March 31, 2003 11 0
March 31, 2004 14 0
March 31, 2005 17 0
March 31, 2006 16 0
March 31, 2007 15 0

Source: CRS, data as of April, 2007

Non-Aboriginals

Date Temporary
Detained
Deportation
March 31, 2002 30 33
March 31, 2003 28 29
March 31, 2004 26 21
March 31, 2005 39 24
March 31, 2006 36 21
March 31, 2007 26 19

Source: CRS, data as of April, 2007

Releases by Institution

Institution Fiscal Year Day
Parole
Full
Parole
Statutory
Release
Total
Nova 2002-2003 18 2 15 35
2003-2004 20 2 14 36
2004-2005 29 3 21 53
2005-2006 24 3 27 54
2006-2007 24 1 33 58
Joliette 2002-2003 25 4 19 48
2003-2004 26 3 20 49
2004-2005 26 6 32 64
2005-2006 28 3 31 62
2006-2007 30 3 28 61
GVI
(incl. Isabel McNeil)
2002-2003 58 5 39 102
2003-2004 50 13 27 90
2004-2005 55 9 34 98
2005-2006 65 10 43 118
2006-2007 55 5 24 84
OOHL 2002-2003 10 3 4 17
2003-2004 10 2 9 21
2004-2005 16 2 11 29
2005-2006 18 1 14 33
2006-2007 26 1 15 42
RPC 2002-2003 1   5 6
2003-2004     2 2
2004-2005     1 1
2005-2006     6 6
2006-2007 3   1 4
EIFW 2002-2003 38 3 45 86
2003-2004 49 4 57 110
2004-2005 49 7 55 111
2005-2006 49 1 46 96
2006-2007 54 1 51 106
FVI 2002-2003        
2003-2004        
2004-2005 14 6 17 37
2005-2006 19 5 14 38
2006-2007 22 2 18 42
Totals 2002-2003 150 17 127 294
2003-2004 155 24 129 308
2004-2005 189 33 171 393
2005-2006 203 23 181 407
2006-2007 214 13 170 397

Source: OMS, as of April 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007.

  • There was an increase of 35% in releases since fiscal year 2002-2003.

Definition: Releases refer to the offenders' releases. These releases reflect federal jurisdiction offenders only. It does not include those who move from one type of release to another in the community.

Note: The majority of women offenders are released from a federal facility on Day Parole and convert over to Full Parole once in the community.
Other forms of release including warrant expiry and bail are not included in the above table. Day Parole and Full Parole releases are at the discretion of the National Parole Board. Statutory Release is a mandatory form of release unless there is reason to believe that a person will commit a violent offence prior to their Warrant Expiry Date.

Aboriginal Releases by Institution

Institution Fiscal Year Day
Parole
Full
Parole
Statutory
Release
Total
Nova 2002-2003 3   1 4
2003-2004 3   1 4
2004-2005 3   2 5
2005-2006 4 1 4 9
2006-2007 3   4 7
Joliette 2002-2003     3 3
2003-2004 1   1 2
2004-2005 1   1 2
2005-2006 1   1 2
2006-2007 1     1
GVI
(incl. Isabel McNeil)
2002-2003 2 1 2 5
2003-2004 4 1 9 14
2004-2005 4   7 11
2005-2006 3   6 9
2006-2007 4   5 9
OOHL 2002-2003 7 2 3 12
2003-2004 8 1 8 17
2004-2005 12 2 10 24
2005-2006 15 1 13 29
2006-2007 15   15 30
RPC 2002-2003 1   1 2
2003-2004     2 2
2004-2005        
2005-2006     2 2
2006-2007 3     3
EIFW 2002-2003 17 1 24 42
2003-2004 16 1 32 49
2004-2005 25 3 32 60
2005-2006 24   30 54
2006-2007 22   31 53
FVI 2002-2003        
2003-2004        
2004-2005 7   10 17
2005-2006 3   5 8
2006-2007 6   10 16
Totals 2002-2003 30 4 34 68
2003-2004 32 3 53 88
2004-2005 52 5 62 119
2005-2006 50 2 61 113
2006-2007 54   65 119

Source: OMS, as of April 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007.

Non-Aboriginal Releases by Institution

Institution Fiscal Year Day
Parole
Full
Parole
Statutory
Release
Total
Nova 2002-2003 15 2 14 31
2003-2004 17 2 13 32
2004-2005 26 3 19 48
2005-2006 20 2 23 45
2006-2007 21 1 29 51
Joliette 2002-2003 25 4 16 45
2003-2004 25 3 19 47
2004-2005 25 6 31 62
2005-2006 27 3 30 60
2006-2007 29 3 28 60
GVI
(incl. Isabel McNeil)
2002-2003 56 4 37 97
2003-2004 46 12 18 76
2004-2005 51 9 27 87
2005-2006 62 10 37 109
2006-2007 51 5 19 75
OOHL 2002-2003 3 1 1 5
2003-2004 2 1 1 4
2004-2005 4   1 5
2005-2006 3   1 4
2006-2007 11 1   12
RPC 2002-2003     4 4
2003-2004        
2004-2005     1 1
2005-2006     4 4
2006-2007     1 1
EIFW 2002-2003 21 2 21 44
2003-2004 33 3 25 61
2004-2005 24 4 23 51
2005-2006 25 1 16 42
2006-2007 32 1 20 53
FVI 2002-2003        
2003-2004        
2004-2005 7 6 7 20
2005-2006 16 5 9 30
2006-2007 16 2 8 26
Totals 2002-2003 120 13 93 226
2003-2004 123 21 76 220
2004-2005 137 28 109 274
2005-2006 153 21 120 294
2006-2007 160 13 105 278

Source: OMS, as of April 2007. Data from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2007.

Offence Profile by Region - Community

Region Fiscal Year First
Degree
Murder
Second
Degree
Murder
Sched. I Sched. II Non
Sched.
Total
Atlantic 2002-2003   2 14 4 7 27
2003-2004   1 12 5 5 23
2004-2005   4 19 10 7 40
2005-2006   6 23 7 11 47
2006-2007   8 20 5 17 50
Quebec 2002-2003 2 11 23 37 12 83
2003-2004 2 11 25 30 10 76
2004-2005 1 12 30 32 12 86
2005-2006 1 10 21 36 14 81
2006-2007 1 12 26 36 17 92
Ontario 2002-2003 1 27 36 93 18 174
2003-2004 1 28 34 89 22 173
2004-2005 1 28 41 64 27 160
2005-2006 2 30 37 87 23 177
2006-2007 3 29 39 78 21 170
Prairies 2002-2003 1 9 46 52 15 122
2003-2004 2 6 44 38 14 102
2004-2005 2 7 56 35 19 117
2005-2006 2 8 57 33 21 119
2006-2007 2 9 48 55 22 136
Pacific 2002-2003   14 19 12 5 50
2003-2004   16 18 13 7 54
2004-2005   16 26 9 7 58
2005-2006   19 26 13 13 71
2006-2007   21 21 14 9 65
Total 2002-2003 4 63 138 198 57 456
2003-2004 5 62 133 175 58 428
2004-2005 4 67 172 150 72 461
2005-2006 5 73 164 176 82 495
2006-2007 6 79 154 188 86 513

Source: OMS, as of year end snapshot.

  • On March 31, 2007, 47% (239) women offenders in the community had been convicted of a violent offence.

Violent offences include first degree murder, second degree murder and offences listed under Schedule 1.

Offence Profile - Community Aboriginal

Region Fiscal Year First
Degree
Murder
Second
Degree
Murder
Sched. I Sched. II Non
Sched.
Total
Atlantic 2002-2003   1 1     2
2003-2004     1     1
2004-2005   1 1   3 5
2005-2006   3 3   2 8
2006-2007   3 5     8
Quebec 2002-2003           0
2003-2004     1 1   2
2004-2005     2     2
2005-2006     2   1 3
2006-2007         1 1
Ontario 2002-2003   2 4 2 2 10
2003-2004   2 7   1 10
2004-2005   2 3 3 2 10
2005-2006   2 3 4   9
2006-2007   2 5 5   12
Prairies 2002-2003   6 30 17 1 54
2003-2004   3 30 13 2 48
2004-2005   4 40 10 3 57
2005-2006   5 43 14 4 66
2006-2007   5 36 21 6 68
Pacific 2002-2003   2 4     6
2003-2004   3 5 1 1 10
2004-2005   3 13 1   17
2005-2006   3 10   1 14
2006-2007   6 8     14
Total 2002-2003   11 39 19 3 72
2003-2004   8 44 15 4 71
2004-2005   10 59 14 8 91
2005-2006   13 61 18 8 100
2006-2007   16 54 26 7 103

Source: OMS, as of year end snapshot.

Offence Profile - Community Non-Aboriginal

Region Fiscal Year First
Degree
Murder
Second
Degree
Murder
Sched. I Sched. II Non
Sched.
Total
Atlantic 2002-2003 0 1 13 4 7 25
2003-2004 0 1 11 5 5 22
2004-2005 0 3 18 10 4 35
2005-2006 0 3 20 7 9 39
2006-2007 0 5 15 5 17 42
Quebec 2002-2003 2 11 23 37 12 83
2003-2004 2 11 24 29 10 74
2004-2005 1 12 28 32 12 84
2005-2006 1 10 19 36 13 78
2006-2007 1 12 26 36 16 91
Ontario 2002-2003 1 25 32 91 16 164
2003-2004 1 26 27 89 21 163
2004-2005 1 26 38 61 25 150
2005-2006 2 28 34 83 23 168
2006-2007 3 27 34 73 21 158
Prairies 2002-2003 1 3 16 35 14 68
2003-2004 2 3 14 25 12 54
2004-2005 2 3 16 25 16 60
2005-2006 2 3 14 19 17 53
2006-2007 2 4 12 34 16 68
Pacific 2002-2003 0 12 15 12 5 44
2003-2004 0 13 13 12 6 44
2004-2005 0 13 13 8 7 41
2005-2006 0 16 16 13 12 57
2006-2007 0 15 13 14 9 51
Total 2002-2003 4 52 99 179 54 384
2003-2004 5 54 89 160 54 357
2004-2005 4 57 113 136 64 370
2005-2006 5 60 103 158 74 395
2006-2007 6 63 100 162 79 410

Source: OMS, as of year end snapshot.

Community Supervision Population by Ethnic Origin

Race Fiscal Year Day
Parole
Full
Parole
Statutory
Release
Total
Aboriginal 2002-2003 15 38 8 61
2003-2004 11 35 11 57
2004-2005 22 35 17 74
2005-2006 18 46 19 83
2006-2007 22 46 20 88
Asiatic 2002-2003 3 17 3 23
2003-2004 1 14 1 16
2004-2005 5 11 2 18
2005-2006 3 10 3 16
2006-2007 3 15 2 20
Black 2002-2003 7 39 5 51
2003-2004 6 42 1 49
2004-2005 3 31 3 37
2005-2006 10 31 4 45
2006-2007 12 30 2 44
Latin American 2002-2003 1 3 2 6
2003-2004 0     0
2004-2005 0     0
2005-2006 0     0
2006-2007 0     0
Caucasian 2002-2003 41 155 35 231
2003-2004 47 151 27 225
2004-2005 53 154 45 252
2005-2006 43 177 37 257
2006-2007 55 181 39 275
Others 2002-2003 4 15 1 20
2003-2004 2 17 2 21
2004-2005 7 18 2 27
2005-2006 1 21 1 23
2006-2007 5 17 1 23
Total 2002-2003 71 267 54 392
2003-2004 67 259 42 368
2004-2005 90 249 69 408
2005-2006 75 285 64 424
2006-2007 97 289 64 450

Source: CRS, as of dates listed above. Women Offenders temporary detained have been excluded.

  • As of March 31, 2007, 61% (275) of federal women offenders currently under supervision were Caucasian;
  • Aboriginal women currently account for 20% of the federal women offenders under community supervision;

Others include: Not specified, unknown, blank.

Conditional Release Type in the Community

Date Day
Parole
Full
Parole
Statutory
Release
Other Total
2002-2003 71 267 54 68 460
2003-2004 67 259 42 65 433
2004-2005 90 249 69 57 465
2005-2006 75 285 64 76 500
2006-2007 97 289 64 63 513

Source: CRS, as of dates listed above.

  • The number of women offenders on Day Parole has increased of 37% since March 31, 2003.
  • The number of women offenders on Full Parole has increased of 8% since March 31, 2003
  • The number of women offenders on Statutory Release has increased of 20% since March 31, 2003.

Conditional Release type - Aboriginal

Date Day
Parole
Full
Parole
Statutory
Release
Other Total
2002-2003 15 38 8 11 72
2003-2004 11 35 11 14 71
2004-2005 22 35 17 17 91
2005-2006 18 46 19 17 100
2006-2007 22 46 20 15 103

Source: CRS, as of dates listed above.

Conditional Release Type - Non-Aboriginal

Date Day
Parole
Full
Parole
Statutory
Release
Other Total
2002-2003 56 229 46 57 388
2003-2004 56 224 31 51 362
2004-2005 68 214 52 40 374
2005-2006 57 239 45 59 400
2006-2007 75 243 44 48 410

Source: CRS, as of dates listed above.

Definition: Conditional Release includes: Federal women offenders on active day parole, full parole or statutory release only, actively under supervision (i.e. not suspended) in the community on the day of the snapshot.

Atlantic Region Under Supervision by Parole Office

Supervision
Office
Day
Parole
Full
Parole
Statutory
Release
Suspended
TD
LTSP Deported Total
Bathurst Area Office   1   1 0 0 2
Charlottetown Area Office   1 1 0 0 0 2
Dartmouth Parole Office   4 1 0 0 0 5
Fredericton Area Office   3   0 0 0 3
Halifax Area Parole Office 2 6 1 0 0 0 9
Moncton Area Office 1 3 4 2 0 0 10
Nova Institution for Women     1 0 0 0 1
Saint John Area Office 2   1 2 0 0 5
St. John’s Area Office 1 4   0 1 0 6
Sydney Area Office 3 1   0 0 0 4
Truro Area Office   3   0 0 0 3
Grand Total 9 26 9 5 1 0 50

Source: OMS, Snapshot as of April 8, 2007

  • Of these, 8 women are Aboriginal, 2 DP, 1 from Halifax Area Parole Office and 1 from Sidney Area Office; 5 FP, 1 from Darmouth Parole Office, 2 from Fredericton Area Office, 2 from Halifax Area Parole Office and 1 SR from Moncton Area Office;

Quebec Region Under Supervision by Parole Office

Supervision
Office
Day
Parole
Full
Parole
Statutory
Release
Suspended
TD
LTSP Deported Total
Lanaudière Area Parole Office   2 3       5
Laurentian Area Parole Office   3 1       4
Laval Area Parole Office   1   1     2
Longueuil Area Parole Office   6         6
Maisonneuve Area Parole Office   1         1
Martineau CCC     3       3
Montreal East   1         1
Québec Area Parole Office 1 10   1     12
Rimouski Area Parole Office   1         1
Rouyn-Noranda Area Parole Office   2         2
Trois Rivières Area Parole Office   3         3
Ville Marie Area Parole Office 9 29 11 2   1 52
Grand Total 10 59 18 4 0 1 92

Source: OMS, Snapshot as of April 8, 2007

  • Of these, 1 is an Aboriginal woman on full parole, in Quebec Area Parole Office.

Ontario Region Under Supervision by Parole Office

Supervision
Office
Day
Parole
Full
Parole
Statutory
Release
Suspended
TD
LTSP Deported Total
Barrie Area Parole Office   7 1   0 0 8
Brantford Area Parole Office       1 0 0 1
Guelph Area Parole Office 3 2 1   0 0 6
Hamilton Parole Office 9 10   2 0 0 21
Kingston Case Prep (Closed)         0 3 3
Kingston Area Parole Office   10     0 1 11
London Area Parole Office   2 1 2 0 0 5
North Bay   2     0 0 2
Ottawa Parole Office 5 7     0 0 12
Peterborough Parole Office   4     0 7 11
Portsmouth Comm. Center 3 2     0 0 5
Sault Ste. Marie Area Parole   2     0 0 2
St. Catharines Area Parole Office   2     0 0 2
Sudbury Area Parole Office   1     0 0 1
Timmins Area Parole Office   1     0 0 1
Windsor Area Parole Office   2 1 1 0 0 4
Women’s Supervision Unit 19 48 5 1 1 1 75
Total 39 102 9 7 1 12 170

Source: OMS, Snapshot as of April 8, 2007

  • Of these, 12 are Aboriginal women; 1 DP in Hamilton Parole Office; 8 FP, 1 in Barrie Area Parole Office, 1 in London Area Parole Office, 1 in North Bay, 2 in Ottawa Parole Office, 1 in Sault-Ste-Marie Area Parole Office and 2 in Women's Supervision Unit; 1 SR, 1 in London Area Parole Office; 2 are TD, 1 in Hamilton and 1 in London Area Parole Office;

Prairie Region Under Supervision by Parole Office

Supervision
Office
Day
Parole
Full
Parole
Statutory
Release
Suspended
TD
LTSP Deported Total
Brandon Parole   2         2
Calgary Area Parole Office 5 13 1 2     21
Driftpile Area Parole Office   1         1
Edmonton Area Parole Office 12 17 5 8   1 43
La Ronge Parole   1         1
Lethbridge Parole 1 3   0     4
Medicine Hat Parole Office   1         1
NWT parole Office   3         3
Prince Albert Parole     1 1     2
Red Deer Parole 1 3   2     6
Regina Parole Office 1 5 4 0   0 10
Saskatoon Parole 4 6 3 4     17
The Pas Area Parole Office   1 2       3
Thunder Bay Parole   2         2
 Wetaskiwin Parole Office   1         1
Wpg Area Parole Office 7 8 4       19
Grand Total 31 67 20 17 0 1 136

Source: OMS, Snapshot as of April 8, 2007

Prairie Region - Aboriginal - Under Supervision by Parole Office

Supervision
Office
Day
Parole
Full
Parole
Statutory
Release
Suspended
TD
LTSP Deported Total
Brandon Parole   2         2
Calgary Area Parole Office 3 3   2     8
Edmonton Area Parole Office 6 6 2 5     19
La Ronge Parole   1         1
Lethbridge Parole 1 1         2
NWT Parole Office   3         3
Prince Albert Parole     1 1     2
Red Deer Parole   1         1
Regina Parole Office   3 4       7
Saskatoon Parole 3 3 2 2     10
The Pas Parole Area Office   1 2       3
Wpg Area Parole Office 2 3 3 1     9
Driftpile Area Parole Office   1         1
Grand Total 15 28 14 11     68

Source: OMS, Snapshot as of April 8, 2007

Pacific Region Under Supervision by Parole Office

Supervision
Office
Day
Parole
Full
Parole
Statutory
Release
Suspended
TD
LTSP  Deported   Total
Kamloops Area Parole Office   4 2 0 0 0 6
Kelowna Parole Office   1 1 0 0 0 2
Nanaimo Parole Office   3   0 0 0 3
New Westminister Area Parole 11 26 5 2 1 5 50
Prince George Parole Office   2 1 0 0 0 3
Vernon Parole Office   1   0 0 0 1
Grand Total 11 37 9 2 1 5 65

Source: OMS, Snapshot as of April 8, 2007

  • Of these, 14 are Aboriginal women; 4 DP, all in New Westminster Parole, 4 are FP, 1 in Kamloops Parole Office, 1 in Nanaimo Parole Office and 2 in New Westminster Parole; 4 on SR, 1 in Kamloops Parole Office, 2 in New Westminster Parole and 1 in Prince George Parole Office; 2 are TD, both in New Westminster.

 

ANNEX I - List of Scheduled Offences - Schedule I

SCHEDULE I

(Subsections 107(1), 125(1) and 126(7) and sections 129 and 130)

  1. An offence under any of the following provisions of the Criminal Code, that was prosecuted by way of indictment:
    • (a) paragraph 81(2)(a) (causing injury with intent);
    • (b) subsection 85(1) (using firearm in commission of offence);
    • (b.1) subsection 85(2) (using imitation firearm in commission of offence);
    • (c) subsection 86(1) (pointing a firearm);
    • (d) section 144 (prison breach);
    • (e) section 151 (sexual interference);
    • (f) section 152 (invitation to sexual touching);
    • (g) section 153 (sexual exploitation);
    • (h) section 155 (incest);
    • (i) section 159 (anal intercourse);
    • (j) section 160 (bestiality, compelling, in presence of or by child);
    • (k) section 170 (parent or guardian procuring sexual activity by child);
    • (l) section 171 (householder permitting sexual activity by or in presence of child);
    • (m) section 172 (corrupting children);
    • (n) subsection 212(2) (living off the avails of prostitution by a child);
    • (o) subsection 212(4) (obtaining sexual services of a child);
    • (o.1) section 220 (causing death by criminal negligence);
    • (o.2) section 221 (causing bodily harm by criminal negligence);
    • (p) section 236 (manslaughter);
    • (q) section 239 (attempt to commit murder);
    • (r) section 244 (causing bodily harm with intent);
    • (s) section 246 (overcoming resistance to commission of offence);
    • (s.1) subsections 249(3) and (4) (dangerous operation causing bodily harm and dangerous operation causing death);
    • (s.2) subsections 255(2) and (3) (impaired driving causing bodily harm and impaired driving causing death);
    • (s.3) section 264 (criminal harassment);
    • (t) section 266 (assault);
    • (u) section 267 (assault with a weapon or causing bodily harm);
    • (v) section 268 (aggravated assault);
    • (w) section 269 (unlawfully causing bodily harm);
    • (x) section 270 (assaulting a peace officer);
    • (y) section 271 (sexual assault);
    • (z) section 272 (sexual assault with a weapon, threats to a third party or causing bodily harm);
    • (z.1) section 273 (aggravated sexual assault);
    • (z.2) section 279 (kidnapping);
    • (z.3) section 344 (robbery);
    • (z.4) section 433 (arson -- disregard for human life);
    • (z.5) section 434.1 (arson -- own property);
    • (z.6) section 436 (arson by negligence); and
    • (z.7) paragraph 465(1)(a) (conspiracy to commit murder).
  2. An offence under any of the following provisions of the Criminal Code, as they read immediately before July 1, 1990, that was prosecuted by way of indictment:
    • (a) section 433 (arson);
    • (b) section 434 (setting fire to other substance); and
    • (c) section 436 (setting fire by negligence).
  3. An offence under any of the following provisions of the Criminal Code, chapter C-34 of the Revised Statutes of Canada, 1970, as they read immediately before January 4, 1983, that was prosecuted by way of indictment:
    • (a) section 144 (rape);
    • (b) section 145 (attempt to commit rape);
    • (c) section 149 (indecent assault on female);
    • (d) section 156 (indecent assault on male);
    • (e) section 245 (common assault);
    • (f) section 246 (assault with intent).
  4. An offence under any of the following provisions of the Criminal Code, chapter C-34 of the Revised Statutes of Canada, 1970, as they read immediately before January 1, 1988, that was prosecuted by way of indictment:
    • (a) section 146 (sexual intercourse with a female under 14);
    • (b) section 151 (seduction of a female between 16 and 18);
    • (c) section 153 (sexual intercourse with step-daughter);
    • (d) section 155 (buggery or bestiality);
    • (e) section 157 (gross indecency);
    • (f) section 166 (parent or guardian procuring defilement); and
    • (g) section 167 (householder permitting defilement).
  5. The offence of breaking and entering a place and committing an indictable offence therein, as provided for by paragraph 348(1)(b) of the Criminal Code, where the indictable offence is an offence set out in sections 1 to 4 of this Schedule and its commission:
    • (a) is specified in the warrant of committal;
    • (b) is specified in the Summons, Information or Indictment on which the conviction has been registered;
    • (c) is found in the reasons for judgment of the trial judge; or
    • (d) is found in a statement of facts admitted into evidence pursuant to section 655 of the Criminal Code.
  6. An offence under any of the following provisions of the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act:
    • (a) section 4 (genocide, etc., committed in Canada);
    • (b) section 5 (breach of responsibility committed in Canada by military commanders or other superiors);
    • (c) section 6 (genocide, etc., committed outside Canada); and
    • (d) section 7 (breach of responsibility committed outside Canada by military commanders or other superiors). 1992, c. 20, Sch. I; 1995, c. 39, s. 165, c. 42, ss. 64 to 67; 2000, c. 24, s. 41.

ANNEX II - List of Scheduled Offences - Schedule II

(Subsections 107(1) and 125(1) and sections 129, 130 and 132)

  1. An offence under any of the following provisions of the Narcotic Control Act, as it read immediately before the day on which section 64 of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act came into force, that was prosecuted by way of indictment:
    • (a) section 4 (trafficking);
    • (b) section 5 (importing and exporting);
    • (c) section 6 (cultivation);
    • (d) section 19.1 (possession of property obtained by certain offences); and
    • (e) section 19.2 (laundering proceeds of certain offences).
  2. An offence under any of the following provisions of the Food and Drugs Act, as it read immediately before the day on which section 64 of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act came into force, that was prosecuted by way of indictment:
    • (a) section 39 (trafficking in controlled drugs);
    • (b) section 44.2 (possession of property obtained by trafficking in controlled drugs);
    • (c) section 44.3 (laundering proceeds of trafficking in controlled drugs);
    • (d) section 48 (trafficking in restricted drugs);
    • (e) section 50.2 (possession of property obtained by trafficking in restricted drugs); and
    • (f) section 50.3 (laundering proceeds of trafficking in restricted drugs).
  3. An offence under any of the following provisions of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act that was prosecuted by way of indictment:
    • (a) section 5 (trafficking);
    • (b) section 6 (importing and exporting);
    • (c) section 7 (production);
    • (d) section 8 (possession of property obtained by certain offences); and
    • (e) section 9 (laundering proceeds of certain offences).
  4. The offence of conspiring, as provided by paragraph 465(1)(c) of the Criminal Code, to commit any of the offences referred to in items 1 to 3 of this schedule.
    1992, c. 20, Sch. II; 1995, c. 42, s. 68; 1996, c. 19, s. 64.