Correctional Service Canada
www.csc-scc.gc.ca
Home > Research > FORUM on Corrections Research > Volume 3, Number 1
Institutional links
-
Subjects
-
Working at CSC
-
Resources
-
Proactive Disclosure
Education and Recidivism
|
It is frequently asserted that the rate of recidivism is an inadequate test of the effectiveness of
correctional education, that recidivism is only one measure of effectiveness. Further-more, other
factors may confound the effects of education; that is, we may be "doomed" from the outset to find no
positive effect on recidivism rates.
While the Research and Statistics Branch recognizes the complex and controversial issues surrounding
the measurement of program impact in corrections, we thought it worthwhile to highlight our review of
research on the effect of basic education on the recidivism of adult male offenders. Our findings
suggest that basic education has a positive impact on recidivism.
From approximately 30 studies on the relationship between educational programming in prisons and
recidivism among offenders, our analysis examined seven, which deal specifically with basic education
among adult male offenders.
The table presents a brief description of the types of studies completed
and their results. It should be noted that all seven studies examined
in our analysis used relatively sound methodologies. Sample sizes ranged
from 75 offenders to more than 3,000, and the follow-up period for examining
recidivism was also substantial (the shortest period being approximately
two years). More importantly, we observed that the studies with the soundest
methodologies yielded the most positive findings.
Table 1
Study |
Setting |
Number of
Offenders |
Follow-up
Period
(months) |
Recidivism
Effect |
Recidivism Rates
(Participants)
(Comparison) |
| |
Glaser
1964 |
5 U.S.
Federal
Institutions |
2908 |
48 |
No |
participants 39%
comparison 33% |
Ingails
1978 |
Canadian Federal
Penitentiary:
Drumheller |
89 |
60 |
No |
participants 81%
comparison 62% |
Moce
1978 |
West Virginia
State Institutions |
320 |
48 |
Yes |
participants 13%
comparison 26% |
Mason &
Seidler
1977 |
Oregon State
Institutions |
405 |
20-26 |
No |
participants 20%
comparison 22% |
Stevens
1986 |
18 State of
Georgia Institutions |
3041 |
24 |
Yes |
participants 12%
comparison 19% |
Walsh
1983 |
Adult Probation
Ohio |
75 |
42 |
Yes* |
participants 16%
comparison 44% |
Zank
1970 |
New Castle
Institution:
Delaware |
220 |
up to
60 |
Yes* |
participants 40%
comparison 60% |
| * Random or matched comparison group design |
At first glance, there appears to be rather weak support for the conclusion that participation in basic
education programs has a positive impact on recidivism - only four of the seven studies found that the
recidivism rates of participants were significantly lower than those of the comparison groups. Upon
closer examination, however, the results become more convincing. Three of the seven studies used a
random or matched comparison group design, that is, an appropriate and convincing method of selecting
their samples. Notably, all three of these studies found that the recidivism rate of participants in the
basic education programs was significantly lower than that of the comparison group. We consider this an
important finding.
In summary, although our review of the literature was by no means exhaustive, we did find research to
support the belief that participation in basic education programs by adult male offenders has a positive
effect on their recidivism rates.
The full report on this research review is available from the Research and
Statistics Branch of the Correctional Service of Canada. |