Correctional Service Canada
Symbol of the Government of Canada

FORUM on Corrections Research

Education and Recidivism

It is frequently asserted that the rate of recidivism is an inadequate test of the effectiveness of correctional education, that recidivism is only one measure of effectiveness. Further-more, other factors may confound the effects of education; that is, we may be "doomed" from the outset to find no positive effect on recidivism rates.

While the Research and Statistics Branch recognizes the complex and controversial issues surrounding the measurement of program impact in corrections, we thought it worthwhile to highlight our review of research on the effect of basic education on the recidivism of adult male offenders. Our findings suggest that basic education has a positive impact on recidivism.

From approximately 30 studies on the relationship between educational programming in prisons and recidivism among offenders, our analysis examined seven, which deal specifically with basic education among adult male offenders.

The table presents a brief description of the types of studies completed and their results. It should be noted that all seven studies examined in our analysis used relatively sound methodologies. Sample sizes ranged from 75 offenders to more than 3,000, and the follow-up period for examining recidivism was also substantial (the shortest period being approximately two years). More importantly, we observed that the studies with the soundest methodologies yielded the most positive findings.



Table 1
Study
Setting
Number of
Offenders

Follow-up
Period
(months)

Recidivism
Effect
Recidivism Rates
(Participants)
(Comparison)
 
Glaser
1964
5 U.S.
Federal
Institutions
2908
48
No
participants 39%
comparison 33%
Ingails
1978
Canadian Federal
Penitentiary:
Drumheller
89
60
No
participants 81%
comparison 62%
Moce
1978
West Virginia
State Institutions
320
48
Yes
participants 13%
comparison 26%
Mason &
Seidler
1977
Oregon State
Institutions
405
20-26
No
participants 20%
comparison 22%
Stevens
1986
18 State of
Georgia Institutions
3041
24
Yes
participants 12%
comparison 19%
Walsh
1983
Adult Probation
Ohio
75
42
Yes*
participants 16%
comparison 44%
Zank
1970
New Castle
Institution:
Delaware
220
up to
60
Yes*
participants 40%
comparison 60%
* Random or matched comparison group design

At first glance, there appears to be rather weak support for the conclusion that participation in basic education programs has a positive impact on recidivism - only four of the seven studies found that the recidivism rates of participants were significantly lower than those of the comparison groups. Upon closer examination, however, the results become more convincing. Three of the seven studies used a random or matched comparison group design, that is, an appropriate and convincing method of selecting their samples. Notably, all three of these studies found that the recidivism rate of participants in the basic education programs was significantly lower than that of the comparison group. We consider this an important finding.

In summary, although our review of the literature was by no means exhaustive, we did find research to support the belief that participation in basic education programs by adult male offenders has a positive effect on their recidivism rates.



The full report on this research review is available from the Research and Statistics Branch of the Correctional Service of Canada.