Characteristics of Offenders Participating in Academic Education Programs
|
A recent American study found interesting differences between inmates who participated in prison
education programs and those who did not. Specifically, inmates who participated tended to be older
and unmarried and to be serving a sentence of more than five years.
Of the 230 respondents who had entered the institution without a GED or high-school diploma, 64% had
received their GED since their entry into the institution, 5% were currently enroled in primary or
secondary school classes, and the remaining 31% did not have a GED and were not enroled in classes.
For the purpose of the study, those who had achieved their GED in the institution and those who were
currently enroled in classes were combined to form the group of "inmates who attend school" (N=159).
Those who did not have their GED and were not enroled in classes formed the control group of "inmates
who do not attend school" (N=71). Figure 1 ![]() Approximately 80% of inmates who attended school, compared with 57.1% of those who did not attend, were at least 25 years old. More than three quarters of those who attended school, compared with 63.4% of the control group, were unmarried. And approximately 83% of the inmates who attended school, versus 69% of those who did not attend, had two or fewer children. With respect to prison status variables, more than two thirds of those who attended school had spent over five years in prison, whereas the majority of the control group had been incarcerated for five years or less. In general, inmates who attended school were more likely to have also participated in non-academic programs. This finding was statistically significant for participation in the Alternatives to Violence Program, which teaches non-violent reactions to various situations; almost half of those who attended school, compared with only 16.4% of the control group, had participated in this program. This finding may imply that inmates who attend school are more apt to take advantage of institutional programming in general. Regarding family support and attitudes, 55.8% of inmates who attended school reported having a lot of support from their friends, and 91% considered family support to be important. Although the corresponding figures for the control group were also high, they were significantly lower than those of the experimental group. The survey findings appear to indicate that increasing the level of inmate participation in educational programming will require targeting the needs of younger inmates and those who are new to the prison system. In addition, at the time of the study, potential earnings for work in prison industry in New York State institutions were ten times higher than for participation in academic programs. It has therefore been suggested that the financial incentives offered for industry work should also be offered for academic work in order to boost inmate participation in educational programs. In Correctional Service of Canada institutions, the pay scales for participation in prison industry also apply to participation in academic programs. In other words, the same potential earnings are available for both endeavours. The exact amount of financial reward is determined not by the type of work done but by how well it is done. In light of the findings of the present study, it appears that the policy of offering equal financial incentives may encourage a larger proportion of inmates with outside financial obligations to continue or complete their education while serving their sentence. Glover, J.W., & Lotze, E.W. (1989). Prison Schooling: Who Gets Educated? Journal of Correctional Education 40, no.3, 108-114. |