The Readability of Inmate Handbooks
|
The educational level of those entering federal institutions is low. Of the 5,776 federal offenders
who took part in some kind of educational program during the 1989-90 fiscal year, close to one third
participated in the adult basic education (ABE) program currently, at any one time, about 1,400
offenders - over 10% of the federal inmate population - are enrolled in some type of ABE program.(1)
The Deputy commissioner of the Ontario region, Andrew Graham, speaking in June 1992 to a regional
chairpersons' meeting of the Ontario Region citizens' Advisory committees, stated that 50% to 60% of the
inmates now entering the federal system in Ontario are at a Grade 5 level of education. The inmate handbooks issued to offenders at each federal institution contain essential information on the institution's regulations, programs and practices. can inmates understand the handbooks provided? Study Methods
The sections of inmate handbooks containing regulations concerning visitors, finances and security or
disciplinary matters from seven Canadian institutions were analyzed for their readability. The
analysis was done with the commercial computer program RightWriter 4.0, by Que Software. Although it
is an American program based on the U.S. educational system, it gives an indication of the clarity
and readability of the writing analyzed. Results of the analysis of the inmate handbook sections are shown in the figure. Figure 1 ![]() Sections dealing with financial matters proved easiest to read, requiring from Grade 9 to Grade 10 levels of education, with an average (mean) of 9.4. Regulations regarding visits showed a greater discrepancy in reading ease from institution to institution, ranging from Grade 7 to Grade 14 with an average of 10.7. The disciplinary regulations required education ranging from Grade 9 to Grade 15 with an average of 11.4. Although these differences in the reading levels needed to understand regulations concerning discipline, finances and visitors were not statistically significant, they did approach significance. This suggests that some subjects are more difficult to explain simply than others. No significant differences were noted in the reading levels required for handbooks from institutions of differing security levels, indicating a consistent level of writing within the institutions across Canada and between the security levels. Conclusions
These findings are disturbing. The regulations concerning both pay and visitation involve important
elements in the lives of inmates, yet they are not written simply enough to be understood easily. (1)Correctional Service of Canada, "Adult Basic Education: can It Help Reduce Recidivism?" Forum on Corrections Research, 3, 1(1991), p. 4. |