Community residential centres in Quebec: A tripartite agreement
In public administration, the current "hot" management methods are accountability, empowerment,
restructuring, partnership and cultural change. The tripartite (three partners) agreement on the use of
Quebec community residential centres is an initiative that features all of these favoured management
methods.
Quebec Region's administration of community residences for offenders is also unique in Canada. For
example, the rates paid to operators of community residential facilities are negotiated jointly by the
Correctional Service of Canada, the Direction générale des services correctionnels du
Québec, and their community partners. As well, minimum standards have been developed for all
community residential facilities, and the finding for accommodation resources is based on services
rendered and not on a guaranteed minimum. This too is unique to Quebec Region and the tripartite
agreement.
What is the origin of this agreement? What is it, exactly? To answer these questions properly, we must
go back to the 1970s. Community residential centres In 1969, an amendment to the Parole Act led to what
is today known as day parole. Under this type of parole, an offender must return to prison or a
community residential centre each evening. Therefore, as day parole use grew, so did the need for
centres for offender accommodation and supervision.
In 1973, William Outerbridge, a professor of criminology at the University of Ottawa (who later became
chairperson of the National Parole Board), conducted a study of community-based residential centres. He
predicted a stronger demand for these centres as a result of day parole and proposed that both levels of
government work together with the private sector to reach agreements on the operation of community based
residential centres in each region.
Following this report, the Secretariat of the Solicitor General of Canada organized a national forum on
community-based residential centres. At the conclusion of this forum, the privately run Quebec centres
formed the Association des membres des centres résidentiels communautaires du Québec, a
move facilitated by the fact that the majority of the centres were already members of the Quebec
Association of Social Rehabilitation Agencies. Regional joint committees At a federal-provincial
conference in December 1973, the Canadian federal and provincial ministers responsible for corrections
agreed to create joint committees for the coordination of correctional services, facilities and
resources (including both institutional and community programs) in every region of the country. These
committees could identify their own objectives, priorities and work methods and determine the best means
of their implementation.
The first meeting of Quebec's regional joint committee was held in Québec City, in October 1974.
The participants were executives from the National Parole Board, the Quebec Department of Justice, the
Canadian Penitentiary Service, and the National Parole Service (the latter two would later merge to form
the Correctional Service of Canada).
The committee identified four priorities: exchange of inmates, personnel training, offenders with
mental health problems, and community-based residential centres. This last priority led to the creation
of an accreditation committee.
It is worth noting that the joint committee eventually came to be made up of representatives of the
Correctional Service of Canada, the Direction générale des services correctionnels du
Québec, the National Parole Board, the Commission québécoise des libérations
conditionnelles, and the Ministry Secretariat of the Solicitor General of Canada. The accreditation
committee The accreditation committee's mandate was to develop policies for community residential
centres and to plan and coordinate correctional activities related to the use of community
resources.
In February 1979, the regional joint committee approved minimum requirements for community residential
centres, as formulated by the accreditation committee. The philosophy of the centres was stated as
follows:
"Every resident of a community residential centre, whether an offender or ex-inmate, on probation or
parole, must be able to benefit from a humane residential service, based on a program that will
gradually enable him (or her) to succeed in conducting himself (or herself) as a responsible citizen in
their target community...." [translation]
The accreditation committee and the Association des membres des centres résidentiels
communautaires du Québec then each conducted their own study to identify the costs of
implementing these requirements. Tripartite agreement Finally, in January 1981, the two levels of
government and the Association des membres des centres résidentiels communautaires du
Québec approved a tripartite agreement. The agreement was the result of the combined efforts of
many participants, all wanting to move in the same direction.
However, nothing was signed at the ministerial or deputy ministerial level to provide a framework for
the agreement. Consequently, this was a purely administrative rather than political agreement.
Implementation In 1987, the Association des membres des centres résidentiels communautaires du
Québec asked to join the regional joint committee, but in view of the variety of issues covered
by the committee, a tripartite committee - made up of representatives of the executive committee of the
Association des résidences communautaires du Québec (formerly the Association des membres
des centres résidentiels communautaires du Québec), the Direction générale
des services correctionnels du Québec, and the Correctional Service of Canada-was formed
instead.
The principal tasks of the tripartite committee are to reassess funding for residential resources (in
general) and all standards applicable to them, to exchange information, and to inform the regional joint
committee about the condition of, and level of funding for, community residential centres. An effective
partnership The tripartite agreement has meant an expansion of partnerships in the field of corrections
- the various arms of the two levels of government have been consulting each other and exchanging
information regularly for more than 20 years, and the private sector is also now fully involved in the
process of negotiating the daily rates paid by the two levels of government to operators of community
residential centres.
There is no question that this excellent initiative has yielded positive results and made possible a
partnership between two levels of government and the public and private sectors.
(1)Correctional Operations, Correctional Service of Canada, 2nd Floor, 340
Laurier Avenue West, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0P9.