Recent statistical trends shaping the corrections population in Canada
During the five-year period 1989-1990 to 1994-1995 the inmate populations in Canada grew rapidly. According to a special report prepared for the Federal/Provincial/ Territorial (FPT) Ministers Responsible for Justice, the federal penitentiary population grew especially quickly -- by 22%, a growth rate twice the historic average.(2) Provincial prison populations also grew rapidly, although their 12% growth was relatively modest by comparison. Fortunately, inmate populations have begun to recede from the peaks achieved in 1994 and 1995, and the correctional system growth rate appears to be slackening.
Although this rapid growth has abated, considerable interest has arisen in identifying and understanding its sources. A special working group of deputy ministers and heads of corrections is currently studying the issue, and periodically issues progress reports.(3) The Research Branch of the Correctional Service of Canada is also examining these inmate population growth patterns to identify and quantify factors that might lead to better forecasting. This article reports on some of our preliminary findings.
Sources of rapid population growthThe special FTP working group suggested a number of causes for the rapid growth in inmate populations. The working group agreed that several factors in combination were the likely source of the rapid growth:
Unfortunately, not enough data are available yet from the new Adult Court Survey of the Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics to do a time series analysis, so we cannot say much about actual sentencing trends. The analysis will obviously benefit once this court data is available.
Trends in annual prison admissionsThere is little doubt that a sharp increase in annual admissions contributed significantly to the rapid increase in the inmate populations in provincial and territorial prisons (see Table 1). This increase was also notable at the federal jurisdictional level, although the build-up in annual admissions began earlier and peaked earlier at the provincial-territorial level -- it occurred mainly in the period between 1986-1987 and 1992-1993 and peaked in 1992-1993, a year earlier than the peak in federal admissions in 1993-1994. This was predominantly caused by increases in the "remand" (i.e., non-sentenced) population that began in 1985-1986. For most of this period, if remand admissions had not increased, the admission trend would likely have remained relatively flat (see Figure 1).
Table 1
| Provincial Custody Admissions, Aggregate Sentence and Time Served | ||||||||||||||
| Annual admissions to provincial custody, sentenced and remand | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83-84 | 84-85 | 85-86 | 86-87 | 87-88 | 88-89 | 89-90 | 90-91 | 91-92 | 92-93 | 93-94 | 94-95 | 95-96 | 96-97 | |
| Sentenced admissions | 129,748 | 123,771 | 119,299 | 116,269 | 117,325 | 116,051 | 115,100 | 114,834 | 120,733 | 121,817 | 119,789 | 117,938 | 114,562 | 107,997 |
| Remand admissions | 60,885 | 61,042 | 63,722 | 67,638 | 72,816 | 82,202 | 84,797 | 92,893 | 123,014 | 123,929 | 120,945 | 120,922 | 115,768 | 117,462 |
| Total admissions | 190,633 | 184,813 | 183,021 | 183,907 | 190,141 | 198,253 | 199,897 | 207,272 | 243,747 | 245,746 | 240,734 | 238,860 | 230,330 | 225,459 |
| Median aggregate sentence for inmates in provincial custody (days) | ||||||||||||||
| Median aggregate sentence | 28 | 28 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 33 | 31 | 31 |
| Median time served by inmates in provincial custody (days) | ||||||||||||||
| Sentenced releases | 24 | 14 | 20 | 22 | 21 | 21 | 22 | 20 | 19 | 18 | 26 | 27 | 27 | 24 |
| Remand releases | 11 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Total releases | 19 | 9 | 12 | 13 | 9 | 9 | 12 | 10 | 11 | 10 | 11 | 6 | 12 | 16 |
| Source: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics; Adult Correctional Services in Canada | ||||||||||||||
Our analysis of federal admissions focuses primarily on federal Warrant of Committal admissions (i.e., inmates serving a 'determinate' sentence of two years or more). Other admission types were excluded to permit an examination of aggregate sentence length and time served. The federal Warrant of Committal admissions sample accounts for nearly two thirds of all federal admissions each year (revocation admissions account for the next largest proportion, or about 30% of admissions each year).(5) Federal admission trends show that the annual number of Warrant of Committal admissions began to increase noticeably only in 1989-1990 (see Figure 2).
Federal Warrant of Committal admissions increased from 4,004 in 1989-1990 to 4,948 in 1993-1994 -- almost 1,000 offenders per year or nearly 25% (see Table 2). After peaking in 1993-1994, admissions decreased to 4,569 per year by 1996-1997. Clearly, the increase in federal Warrant of Committal admissions was significant and contributed in large measure to the rapid growth experienced during the period.
Figure 1

Figure 2
The rapid growth in the federal inmate population began about two years after provincial and territorial admissions had begun to increase. Federal growth accelerated in 1991-1992 and peaked in 1993-1994, lagging the provincial-territorial system by one year. Because the two increases are so nearly synchronized, one could infer that federal and provincial-territorial admission rates were responding to a common force or series of events, but that question remains unanswered. Since peaking two or three years ago, the growth rate has significantly declined in both systems.
Table 2
| Federal Warrant of Committal admissions, aggregate sentence | ||||||||||||
| Annual admissions to federal custody | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85-86 | 86-87 | 87-88 | 88-89 | 89-90 | 90-91 | 91-92 | 92-93 | 93-94 | 94-95 | 95-96 | 96-97 | |
| Sentence length | ||||||||||||
| 2<3 years | 1,462 | 1,477 | 1,458 | 1,524 | 1,644 | 1,588 | 1,928 | 2,050 | 2,037 | 2,041 | 1,961 | 1,818 |
| 3<4 years | 938 | 921 | 898 | 933 | 1,040 | 1,018 | 1,191 | 1,190 | 1,281 | 1,165 | 1,015 | 1,019 |
| 4<5 years | 449 | 487 | 460 | 438 | 506 | 540 | 552 | 640 | 603 | 558 | 530 | 617 |
| 5<6 years | 285 | 260 | 281 | 276 | 283 | 317 | 337 | 340 | 363 | 327 | 326 | 334 |
| 6<7 years | 132 | 129 | 147 | 145 | 173 | 166 | 171 | 188 | 214 | 199 | 162 | 183 |
| 7<8 years | 112 | 132 | 99 | 111 | 116 | 88 | 120 | 141 | 134 | 141 | 140 | 133 |
| 8<9 years | 82 | 71 | 82 | 85 | 65 | 93 | 94 | 108 | 93 | 96 | 62 | 78 |
| 9<10 years | 48 | 40 | 39 | 46 | 42 | 45 | 49 | 46 | 57 | 58 | 42 | 59 |
| 10+ years | 136 | 155 | 162 | 157 | 135 | 150 | 148 | 166 | 166 | 182 | 153 | 142 |
| Total | 3,644 | 3,672 | 3,626 | 3,715 | 4,004 | 4,005 | 4,590 | 4,869 | 4,948 | 4,767 | 4,391 | 4,569 |
Median aggregate sentence sentence
at Warrant of Committal admission (months) |
||||||||||||
| Median aggregate sentence | 46.6 | 47.3 | 47.2 | 47.2 | 46.0 | 46.6 | 44.9 | 45.5 | 45.5 | 45.8 | 44.5 | 43.1 |
| Average time served to first release (months) | ||||||||||||
| 2<3 years | 15.71 | 14.17 | 14.71 | 14.82 | 14.39 | 13.79 | 13.41 | 13.23 | 13.68 | 13.96 | 13.80 | - |
| 3<4 years | 21.04 | 18.77 | 18.57 | 19.10 | 18.23 | 17.84 | 17.47 | 17.31 | 18.35 | 16.97 | - | - |
| 4<5 years | 25.35 | 23.70 | 25.27 | 24.52 | 22.15 | 23.59 | 22.52 | 23.79 | 23.70 | - | - | - |
| Total | 22.25 | 21.67 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Source: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics; Adult Correctional Services in Canada | ||||||||||||
Trends in the average length of sentence
Each year, Statistics Canada publishes the average (median, in days) aggregate sentence for sentenced admissions to provincial and territorial custody and the average (mean, in months) aggregate sentence for admissions to federal custody.(6)
The average sentence length reported for provincial and territorial offenders is about 31 days and it has remained at or about this length since 1988-1989. Median aggregate sentence length for provincial and territorial sentenced admissions has increased since the early 1980s, from 28 days to 31 days, an increase of nearly 11% (see Figure 3). This increase occurred between 1984-1985 and 1988-1989, and, since then, the median sentence has remained stable except for a one-year spike in 1994-1995, which seems to have been transitory. The combination of larger numbers of remand admissions described above and the 11% longer average sentences would contribute substantially to the growth of inmate populations in provincial and territorial prisons.
Figure 3
The mean average aggregate sentence for federal Warrant of Committal admissions is significantly longer than the average provincial-territorial sentence -- about 44 months. This reflects the two-year rule: custodial sentences of two years or more are served in federal penitentiaries, while sentences less than two years may be served in provincial or territorial prisons. The average federal sentence also became shorter over the same period (see Figure 4).
Although there is some year-to-year variation in the federal average, the trend is unmistakably toward shorter federal aggregate sentences. Unlike the evidence presented for the length of the average provincial or territorial sentence, the federal trend suggests that population growth in the federal correctional system was unlikely to have resulted from an increase in the length of the average sentence.
Figure 4
Trends in the average time served
The average time served on recent provincial and territorial sentences (for sentenced releases) appears now to be about 25 days. The average aggregate sentence was found to be about 31 days, so this indicates that the average sentenced provincial offender serves about three quarters of the aggregate sentence in custody. The aggregate sentence length has remained fairly stable over the past decade while the average time served has increased somewhat during this period, thereby contributing to the growth of the provincial and territorial inmate populations.
The average time served for provincial and territorial sentenced offenders increased during the period but time served for remand offenders remained relatively stable (see Figure 5). Remand admissions, however, accounted for most of the admission growth over the past decade and the time served for remand releases showed no real increase. The net effect of these various trends is that the overall time served in provincial and territorial custody has probably decreased slightly although there is a significant spike in the sentenced time served in recent years. With respect to correctional population growth, it is difficult to see any clear pattern although time served for sentenced releases and for total releases have increased since 1992-1993.
Figure 5

Figure 6
For federal offenders, the average time served in federal custody until first release reflects the discretionary release aspect of the Corrections and Conditional Release Act (1992).(7) The data collected is for Warrant of Committal admissions and indicates that the average time served in federal custody has remained relatively constant over the period under review. Figure 6 shows only the average time served for offenders admitted over the past decade with shorter aggregate sentences (e.g., those between two years to less than three years and including four years to less than five years) because the follow-up period for offenders with longer sentences in the more recent years is not long enough for good estimates. (Note that offenders sentenced to terms of less than five years represent nearly 80% of all Warrant of Committal admissions). Most federal offenders, especially those serving shorter two- to five-year sentences, serve about half of their sentence in custody and the other half under supervision in the community. Provincial or territorial offenders serve only about one third of their sentence in custody.
The average time served in federal custody appears to have decreased slightly since 1987. It is therefore unlikely that the length of time served would have contributed materially to the recent rapid growth of the federal inmate population.
Summary and conclusionsOf the three major factors examined here, growth in new admissions seems to be the main factor in the sudden population growth in correctional institutions. This growth appeared first in the provincial-territorial system, and lasted about five years, from 1986-1987 to 1991-1992. In the federal system, the increase began three years later (starting in 1989-1990), also lasted about five years, and ended in 1994-1995, after provincial admission growth had peaked.
Secondly, provincial and territorial systems also have to take into account the increase (11%) in aggregate sentences, along with a slight recent increase in the average time served. Both the average sentence and time served trends show a decrease for federal admissions, suggesting that these factors had a moderating effect on penitentiary population growth.
If the growth of Canada's inmate population was driven mainly by an increase in new admissions, what were the forces driving the growth in admissions? This question cannot be answered from these data; further research is required.
The special working group mentioned several factors other than the three examined here. Perhaps some answers may be found in that list. In addition, we think some of the growth resulted from major changes in the corrections legislation (e.g., Bill C-67, 1987; Bill C-36, 1992) and the Criminal Code of Canada. Finally, since 1978, Canada has experienced two major recessions, a massive restructuring of the economy and considerable regional restructuring. These changes have all affected the populations of correctional systems, but the extent of these effects has yet to be analyzed.
These results present the corrections community with another challenge -- admission patterns are notoriously difficult to predict. The Service is just beginning to develop a forecasting model for federal admissions. We expect this development to augment our knowledge about correctional population dynamics, and hope to understand the general predictors of growth better. We will report our results as this research progresses.
2. Corrections Population Growth, Report for Federal/Provincial/Territorial Ministers Responsible for Justice (Ottawa, ON, May 1996): 1 and 4.
3. A progress report under the same title was issued in February 1997.
4. Corrections Population Growth: 2.
5. A Warrant of Committal admission file was developed for the Service covering the 1985-1986 to 1995-1996 period. The total population from January 1, 1994, to September 1, 1996, contains 88,477 federal admissions, of which approximately two thirds (66.4%) are Warrant of Committal admissions, slightly under one third (30.6%) are Revocation or Termination admissions, and the rest (3%) are "Other" admissions. Of the approximately 59,000 Warrant of Committal admissions, 3.6% were indeterminate sentences (e.g., with no aggregate sentence recorded) and 11.3% were admissions with an aggregate sentence of less than two years. The remaining 85% of Warrant of Committal admissions were selected for analysis. By limiting the study to complete fiscal years (1985-1986 through 1995-1996), the analysis file yielded 46,231 offenders.
6. Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, Adult Correctional Services Canada (annual), Cat. no. 85-211.
7. A federal sentence includes both statutory community supervision (e.g., statutory release -- normally beginning at the last third of the sentence) and discretionary community supervision (e.g., day parole, full parole or both); discretionary community supervision can begin after serving six months of the sentence and is at the discretion of the National Parole Board.