Correctional psychology with young offenders in the community: Philosophical musings
A respectable and growing body of research exists on "what works" in correctional psychology. However,
the focus of the research seems to be on "what to do" and "how to do" clinical practice issues such as
client-selection strategies (level of risk or need), therapeutic approaches (such as
cognitive-behavioural) and outcome prediction. Less adequately addressed are "why to do" issues related
to the delivery of psychological services, particularly in community settings.
This article attempts to fill this void by suggesting a particular philosophical orientation to
clinical work with young offenders in the community. The article argues that the orientation adopted by
Dr. Albert Ellis and other practitioners of Rational-Emotive Behaviour Therapy (including the author) is
well suited to work with young offenders, and has direct and practical implications for therapeutic
procedures and practices. Rational-Emotive Behaviour Therapy In many jurisdictions, public and
professional opinion seem to agree that:
-
young offenders are not interested in changing their behaviour in any meaningful or lasting way;
-
young offender punishment, particularly in the community, is not severe enough to motivate change;
-
young offenders respond poorly to authority and even worse to psychological intervention; and
-
young offenders attend counselling largely for rewards such as weekend passes.
However, my experience dramatically contradicts these observations. I would argue that the philosophical
approach of Rational-Emotive Behaviour Therapy (well recognized in the larger psychological community,
but seldom discussed in a correctional context) provides the basis for rewarding work with young
offenders. Equality of worth Rational-Emotive Behaviour Therapy's first philosophical premise is that
all human beings (by virtue of being alive) are equal in worth, regardless of their conduct. This
statement might easily be dismissed as high-minded moralization, but it is quite the opposite.
Its practical implication is that the practitioner implicitly accepts the young offender, no matter how
awful his or her conduct, as fully deserving of psychological intervention. Client guilt and shame (from
self-condemnation) are rejected as legitimate motivators for change and are treated as symptoms to be
remedied.
From the client's perspective, the explicit sharing of this assumption during the first visit can
indicate a therapist's acceptance of the offender and set the stage for honest self-revelation. The
refusal to discredit the offender's "humanness" arguably reduces the young offender's defensiveness,
generating a greater offender willingness to examine his or her conduct. Responsible hedonism The second
philosophical assumption is that humans are basically hedonistic: pleasure and/or happiness is their
ultimate goal. Practitioners of Rational-Emotive Behaviour Therapy therefore encourage the pursuit of
"responsible hedonism," seeking a balance between short- and long-term personally meaningful goals that
improve the young offender's world or, at least, cause it no undue harm.
A young offender's "what's in it for me?" attitude is not seen as resistance, but as a starting point
for therapeutic intervention. The therapy aims to replace devotion to short-term gratification with, not
self-sacrifice, but a balanced strategy that doesn't sabotage longer-term happiness. Ongoing
psychological assessment A third philosophical assumption, one that often receives lip service in the
correctional community but is rarely applied, is that psychological assessment should be an ongoing and
vital part of the treatment process.
This means eliminating the endless tests and classification schemes that act as entry levels to
therapy. It also requires the recognition that behaviours, cognitions and emotions (not human beings)
are the assessment targets and that a diagnosis not leading to differential treatment is clinically
useless. Finally, it requires the understanding that "secret" diagnoses kept from the client tend to
result in manipulation rather than psycho-educational treatment, and that assessment should complement,
not replace, reasonable offender goals.
The all-too-common occurrence of young offenders arriving at the practitioner's office, fully aware of
their diagnoses but ignorant of strategies for change, validates the importance of this assumption.
Efficiency The fourth principle underlying desirable clinical intervention is efficiency. This principle
generates several practical guidelines. The most obvious is avoiding excessive involvement in an
offender's life. Equally important, but perhaps more subtle, are ranking the client's goals for therapy,
boosting the client's sense of success by aiming for some emotional change within one or two sessions,
and determining the client's commitment to therapy (two or 20 sessions?) and adapting the therapeutic
approach to the time available.
An "efficiency" mindset allows the therapist to target achievable rather than "textbook" goals that the
client may have no interest in achieving. Further, clients often report such efficient practices to be
empowering - they feel that they are not being subjected to the therapist's agenda. This can only
contribute to rapport and client motivation. Three basic insights Three basic insights must also be
communicated to the offender:
-
emotional and behavioural disturbances are caused primarily by inappropriate mental processes
(cognitions), not outside factors;
-
today's emotional disturbances, regardless of their original cause(s), are prolonged by their
transformation into harmful thought processes; and
-
lasting changes usually come only with hard work aimed at changing inappropriate thoughts and
behaviours.
These three insights are especially important given the prevalence of "victimhood" in our culture -
whining, self-pity, other-blaming and claims of personal blamelessness. These culturally sanctioned
ploys, together with the adolescent tendency to deny accountability, make it difficult for young
offenders to accept responsibility for their own change. However, it is a vital starting point for
therapeutic change. "Deep" change The final, and arguably most important premise in Rational-Emotive
Behaviour Therapy is the therapist's recognition that "deep" change is both achievable and desirable.
Fundamental and lasting change is to be valued over simple behavioural change, and this requires changes
in criminogenic and self-harming offender core philosophies.
The practical implication of this assumption is that diversionary tactics (such as relaxation, time
outs and counting backwards by 10s) should be replaced with approaches involving actual changes to
thought processes. Lasting change The philosophy outlined in this article provides a strategic and
effective framework for clinical intervention with young offenders in community settings. Popular
assumptions about the near-universal resistance of young offenders to therapy appear unfounded. Instead,
working with this client group requires:
-
special attention to nonjudgmental acceptance of young offenders and their responsibly hedonistic
goals;
-
establishment of rapport and motivation though quick, efficient focusing of practical
interventions on offender-determined goals;
-
bolstering offender feelings of accountability through the approach's "three insights"; and
-
therapist determination to avoid the easier diversionary methods and to encourage more radical
changes with this clientele.
To paraphrase Dr. Ellis, lasting change is difficult for most people, most of the time. But, sound
philosophies of intervention (as discussed in this article) appear to ease the burden for this
challenging offender population.
(1)W. Winogron, Ph.D., C. Psych., 170 Laurier Ave. West, Suite 912, Ottawa,
Ontario K1P 5V5.